Laserfiche WebLink
T] KLE]NFFIDFR <br />soils may become impacted due to the petroleum constituents detected in groundwater at <br />the MW -4 location near first encountered groundwater including zones in which <br />groundwater may fluctuate seasonally. <br />11. One four point composite sample was analyzed from an approximately 75 yard stockpile <br />located at the subject site. Based on the analytical results it appears diesel and motor oil <br />impacted soil remain in this stockpile <br />6.2 RECOMMENDATIONS <br />1. Kleinfelder recommends shallow excavation of petroleum impacted soil in the washdown <br />area followed by confirmation soil sampling. The approximately 75 yard soil stockpile <br />located at the site should be disposed of according to local and federal regulations. <br />Kleinfelder recommends removal of the excavated washdown area soil and the existing <br />stockpile in a single disposal event. <br />2. Previous remedial activities (excavation of petroleum impacted soil) has occurred at the <br />subject site in the former UST area and a "No Further Action" letter was obtained from <br />the county. Field observations and soil sampling results in the vicinity of the UST shows <br />that petroleum impacted soil remains at approximately depth of 25 to 45 feet in the <br />eastern portion of the southern excavation. However, soil sampling results show a <br />marked decrease in petroleum constituents at 40 feet bgs and none detected results at 50 <br />feet bgs. Groundwater samples from monitoring wells in this area also were reported as <br />non -detect for the requested petroleum constituents including oxygenates from first <br />encountered grow-idwater. Based on these findings and the previous "No Further Action" <br />letter by the county and that the county was aware contamination remained at <br />approximately 30 feet bgs (UST area), Kleinfelder does not recommend further remedial <br />efforts in this area. <br />j. Kleinfelder recommends that a copy of this report should be submitted to San Joaquin <br />County Public Health Services Department, Environmental Health Division (PHSIEHD) <br />and the State of California, Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board <br />(RWQCB) for their review and comment. <br />4. The equipment decontamination rinseate, purge water and drilling returns (soil) currently <br />stored on-site should be properly disposed of by the Client. Kleinfelder can assist the Client <br />in that disposal at an additional charge if requested. <br />This report, and the conclusions and recommendations presented in this Executive Summary, are <br />subject to the "Limitations" presented in Chapter 7 of this report. Any other party (other than <br />The San Joaquin County Mosquito & Vector Control District or regulatory agencies having <br />enforcement jurisdiction for this site) who would like to use this report shall notify Kleinfelder, <br />Inc. of such intended use by executing the "Application for Authorization to Use" which is <br />included as an appendix to this report. <br />36274 / ST03R1919 Page IS of 19 <br />3004 Kleinfelder, Inc. January 3, 2004 <br />