WORK PLANS - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

— k9 KLEINFELDER ATTACHMENT A SCOPE OF WORK Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Update Mosquito Abatement Property 200 North Beckman Road Lodi, California FILE NO. 02001PROP.ENV/ T031`327 September 3, 2003. INTRODUCTION Kleinfelder is pleased to present this proposal to SJC/MVC . This proposal was developed after correspondence with Mr. John Stroh, using Kleinfelder's current understanding of the site conditions, and is a preliminary understanding of SJC/MV D's desires and requirements. Kleinfelder is committed to providing quality service to our clients, commensurate with their wants, needs and desired level of risk. If a portion of this proposal does not meet the needs of SJC/MVCD, or if those needs have changed, Kleinfelder will consider appropriate modifications, subject to the standards of care to which we adhere as professionals. Modifications such as changes in scope, methodology, scheduling, and contract terms and conditions may result in changes to the risks assumed by the client, as well as adjustments to our fees. We look forward to the opportunity to serve you. BACKGROUND NOA Environmental conducted a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment of the subject site, (Project No. LE02-510), dated January 10, 2003. Selected opinions, conclusions and recommendations based on NOA's findings include the following: • "It is NOA's opinion that the subject property being on the various databases and county lists is due to the leaking underground storage tank case in which the file hfd been reviewed. The remediation of the aforementioned case did not remove all of the contamination from the soils beneath the subject property, and contamination may extend to the saturated zone. The Mase was closed; however, it was not a clean closure. It is NOA's opinion that the San Joaquin County Environmental Department could reopen the case when the land use changes or at any other time. • "It is NOA's opinion that the application of herbicides, pesticides (DDT in particular) and larvicides on the subject property represents a threat of environmental degradation to the subject property." • "It is NOA's opinion that the contamination stemming from the LUST case located immediately adjacent and north of the subject property has migrated under the subject site property. The responsible party in the case has been identified. However, it is NOA's opinion that some contention as to the responsibility of the extent of the contamination might arise if the knowledge of the amount of residual contamination on the subject property were made available. Further, the erratic groundwater flow direction may give some credence to third party claims should they arise." 02001PROP.ENV/ST03P327 Page 1 of l I ©2003 Kleinfelder, Inc. September 3,2003