Laserfiche WebLink
�- .-i`-��•._ �.,� u .�,� t g'''.�SF��''�J':zp _'t« - '"` sr7� --..^�crs.. �-+:�mxx�rr-""-^ -^�-x °"® r�-src�s <br />�a. .��''i�s�,a«,T-S. a � ��,fi -, Ty, +? W k'�'�" * � ns..� .JL.,� '�k"5.�•�'�' &. �` "��r.,� <br /> as .. <br /> a <br /> e <br /> Chevron U.S.A. Products Company April 8, 1992 <br /> `• 02320 2241 Page 3 <br /> a traf is-rated street box with a water-tight boltad lid. Well construction details are shown in the drill logs <br /> In Appendix A. <br /> The monitoring wells were developed by hand bailing approximately three to five well volumes of <br /> water to remove fine-grained sediments from the well and filter pack. <br /> 3.4 GROUNDWATER MONITORING AND,SAMPLING <br /> On March 11, 1992,groundwater monitoring was performed at the Chevron site and the Atlantic <br /> Richfield Company(ARCO)service station south of West Benjamin Holt Drive,In coordination with ARCO <br /> consultant Brown and Caldwell. Monitorirg wells were gauged again on March 17,1992 during the required <br /> quarterly monitoring and sampling event(Table 1). The monitoring wells were gauged using an Oil Recovery <br /> Systems (ORS) IfTk ERFACE PROBE Well Monitoring System that utilizes a dual optical sensor and <br /> conductivity probe to dirAinguish between water and petroleum liquids, Prior to groundwater monitoring and <br /> sampling,the wellheads were surveyed(Appendix B). <br /> Quarterly groundwater sampling was conducted on March 17, 1992 and included the collection or <br /> groundwater sampies from the two newly installed monitoring wells(MW t3 and MW 7). Prior to sampling, <br /> the monitoring wells were purged until pH,temperature and total dissolved sands(fDS)readings stabilized. <br /> Field measurements of pH,temperature and TDS are provided In Appendix B. Groundwater samples were <br /> collected using a TeflonA sampler cleaned with an ind!:strial detergent and distilled water. Prior to the <br /> collection of the water samples,a rinsate blank from the TeflonR sampler and a trip blank were collected for <br /> quality assurance/quality control purposes. Each sample was acidified, labeled, and placed on Ice In an <br /> Insulated container for delivery t'ader chain-of-custody manifest to Superior Precision Analytical laboratories. <br /> Groundwater samples were analyzed for TPH-G and BTEX by modified EPA methods 5030/8020/8015. <br /> All water generated during the purging process was transfErred Into a DOT-approved purge water <br /> trailer and transported to the Chevron refinery in Richmond,California for recycling. <br /> 4.0 SITE CONDITIONS <br /> 4.1 HYDROGEOLOGY <br /> The site is located In the northern part of the San Joaquin Valley at an elevation of approximately <br /> three feet above mean sea level. The valley fill consists of late Mesozoic through Eocene dominantly marine <br /> sedimentary rocks overlain by late Tertiary and Quaternary non-marine deposits. In the Stockton area,the <br /> late Cenozoic deposits are approximately 3,000 feet thick and generally consist of alluvial gravel,sand,sift, <br /> and clay. The non-marine sedimentary units are generally fresh-water-bearing in the area of the valley east <br /> and southeast of Stockton, but brackish or saline water occurs in these sediments in the <br /> delta area west <br /> CROI NDWATER <br /> 22415UMVIFT <br /> TECHNOWCI',INC. <br />