Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. KyIc ChrStie <br /> September 24, 1990 <br /> Page 5 <br /> t' <br /> Table 1 presents the chemical analytical results from the groundwater samples collected over the <br /> past 2 years. BETX constituents in the June 1990 groundwater samples from well PR-I are <br /> below detection limits. From the remaining wells that were sampled in June 1990, BETX <br /> constituents are detectable in wells BHD-1, E-2, E-5, E-8, E-10, E-11,and E-12. The benzene <br /> concentration exceeds California Department of Health Services (DHS)Maximum Contami-cant <br /> Levels (MCLs) of I microgram per liter(gg/l)in all of these samples. <br /> Benzene concei:trations have varied in each well over time. The groundwater samples from wells <br /> E-5, E-8, E-10, E-1 t,and E-12 showed increases since they were last sampled(in March 1990). <br /> Decreases in benzene concentration were observed in the samples from wells BHD-1 and E-2. <br /> (These wells were last sampled irk either August or Decenibe: 1989.) A map of the benzene <br /> concentrations in the June 1990 groundwater samples is shown on Figure 1. The benzene <br /> concentrations are not contoured because not all of the wells were sampled. For comparison, <br /> Figure 2 is a contour map of the March 1990 concentrations when all of the wells were sampled. <br /> The concentration of ethylbenzene is above the DHS MCL of 680 pg/l in wells E-10 and BHD-1. <br /> The concentration of toluene is above the DHS Drinking Water Action Level of 100 µg/1 in <br /> monitoring wells E-10 and BHD-1. The concentration of xylene is above the DHS ?ICL of <br /> 1,750 gg/l in monitoring well,E-10 and BHD-1. <br /> Groundwater Flow <br /> Groundwater levels at the site are being measured in each well on a biweekly basis using an <br /> electronic water level indicator. The levels are measured relative to top-cf-casing elevations in <br /> order to determine groundwater elevations and monitor possible changes in flow direction. <br /> Table 2 shows the water-level measurements collected since January 1990. <br /> Beginning in late April 1988, the groundwater flow direction was influenced by the recovery <br /> system. Sometime in April 1989, the recovery pump stopped operating, The malfunction was <br /> detected in June 1989. Repair of the recovery system is almost complete. However,the recovery <br /> system is currently being hampered by unexplained fluctuations in the lower explosive level <br /> meter, which is located in the recovery well. Brown and Caldwell personnel are attempting to <br /> identify the cause of these fluctuations. As a result, the recovery pump is being operated on a <br /> manual basis for testing purposes. On June 18, 1990, Brown and Caldwell personnel measured <br /> water levels at the site. The recovery system was being treated at the time, and had been <br /> pumping at a rate of 5.3 to 5.9 gallons per minute for 4 days, prior to the measurements being <br /> taken. Figure 3 is a water-level contour map for June 18, 1990. The figure shows unsteady state <br /> conditions and that water levels at that time were affected by the pumping. During static <br /> conditions, groundwater flows to the northeast. <br /> As shown on Figure 3, the area of influence from the recovery system extends off site, to each <br /> side of the station. <br /> Brown and Caldwell <br /> �.0�1511!t�IRiS <br />