Laserfiche WebLink
09.August 2000 ; <br /> � <br /> AGE-NC Project No: 95-0106 ; <br /> Page 9 of 10 <br /> • Assuming'a plume of impacted soil 85 feetlong and 75 feet'wide, slightly off-center from <br /> the former UST excavation, and 8 feet thick(from the bottom of the former UST to the floor <br /> sample collected from the excavation), with approximately 61.93 cubic yards of impacted . <br /> soil removed through:excavation;approximately 1,422 cubic yards of impacted soil was left <br /> in place on the subject site. Assuming further that the plume of impacted soil was uniformly <br /> impacted by TPH-g at an average concentration equal to the average TPH-g concentrations <br /> detected in.soil samples collected within the plume subsequent to excavation, the mass of <br /> TPH-g in the impacted soil would be approximately 4,150 kilograms;,the mass of benzene . <br /> in the soil would be approximately 44 kilograms. AGE believes that the actual size of the. <br /> impacted.soil plume Js smaller, that the thickness of the plume decreases radially away from <br />` the former UST pit and that,the hydrocarbon concentrations are currently less than the values <br /> utilized for•this•calculation; the resulting masses are probably too high..Assumptions and . <br /> calculations of,the hydrocarbon masses-are in Appendix C. <br /> 6.0. RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> AGE conservatively calculates that a plume of impacted soil 85 feet long, 75 feet wide, 8 feet thick <br /> and evenly impacted by an average concentration of 2,383.mg/kg TPH-g and 25.4 mg/kg benzene <br /> would contain 4,150 kilograms TPH-g and 44.2'kilograms benzene. The hydrocarbons are primarily <br /> ..adsorbed to fine-grained soil that should retard migration of the hydrocarbons. Theplume of <br /> impacted soil is probably smaller, thinning toward' the edges, and potentially has had .some <br /> hydrocarbon mass reduction through natural attenuation processes. <br /> AGE also interprets the results of this and'previous investigations of the site as'to indicate that TPH- <br /> g and:benzene have impacted ground water in an approximate area possibly as large as 180:feet by . <br /> 110 feet in the soil interval between, 10 feet and 25 feet bsg on and near,the subject property. <br /> Although' not fully,delineated, the plume appears to have-limited mobility as evidenced by the <br /> relative lack of detectable concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons'primarily in samples from. , <br /> MW-2,`MW-3, MW-5, MW-6and MW-7,monitoring wells that surround the probable source area, . <br /> the former UST'pit: A plume thus defined, evenly-impacted by 2 kilograms of gasoline and <br /> 0.27 kilograms of benzene, would yield the average concentration§,detected over the last 5 ground <br /> I water,monitoring events. The actual mass is.probably less in the area delineated-as-the plume on <br /> Figure.5. <br /> _ Although it is possible that the plume of impacted groundwater extends'northwest of MW-4, the <br /> above calculations of hydrocarbon mass shows that the additional mass is not likely to be significant. <br /> AGE recommends that the PHS-EHD consider closure for this site.If the PHS-EHD concurs with <br /> this recommendation, AGE'will prepare a'work plan to abandon the monitoring wells; if the <br /> I PHS-EHD does not concur,.AGE will immediately schedule.a ground water monitoring event. <br />' Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc. <br />