Laserfiche WebLink
09'August 2000" :. <br /> AGE-NC Project-No. 95-0106 <br /> Page 7 of 10 ; <br /> and. 8:5 gg/1 toluene, and 27 µg/l,and 67 jag/l ethylbenzene and 60.9g/1 and 64 ktg/1 xylenes,in <br /> samples from MW-1 and MW-4; respectively. Other analytes were not detected in the two samples. <br /> Neither TPH-g nor BTEX compounds were detected in theground water samples from monitoring- <br /> wells-MW-2,MW-3,MW-5,MW-6(upper)or MW-6(lower).and MW-7. Oxygenated fuel additives <br /> were not detected in any of the ground water samples by EPA Method 8260M.'Analytical results of <br /> ground water samples are summarized-an Tables 2, and 3. The laboratory report (MAI Laboratory <br /> ID 31680 through 31687), QA/QC and chain-of-custody are included in Appendix B. <br /> 5.4. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS <br /> The following conclusions were drawn from-the results of the site investigation: . <br /> • The ground water was generally northward on 24 February,2000, and was calculated'to range <br /> from 0.006 toward the north-northwest to 0.005 toward the north-northeast. <br /> • Ground water elevation at the site increased an average of 1.44 feet since the last.quarterly <br /> monitoring event.. <br /> Dissolved petroleum hydrocarbons were detected in ground water samples from monitoring <br /> wells MW-I and MW-4, located cross to down-gradient on-site and down-gradient off-site, <br /> respectively, from the former UST excavation. . <br /> • Oxygenated compounds were not detected in.any of the ground water samples by EPA <br /> Method 8260-Modified, and have not been,detected in samples from-the site in'the past by- <br /> EPA Method,8260-Modified. <br /> BTEX compounds were detected in the water samples collected from MW-1 and MW-4, the <br /> concentrations of benzene in"both samples exceeded the State of California maximum <br /> contaminant level (MCL) of 1 µg/1 for drinking.water. a. <br /> As can be ween on Table 2; the concentrations of analytes detected in the ground water <br /> samples from the impacted-on-site monitorin well W-1 have generally declined over the <br /> . _ g � . ) g Y _ <br /> course of the six previous;sampling/monitoiing'events, but have rebounded during the four'. <br /> quarters of 1999 and first quarter of 2000. <br /> • Analytical data from monitoring well MW-2 limits the extent of dissolved hydrocarbons <br /> southward of the site. Analytical data from well MW-Sand MW-6 limits the extent of <br /> dissolved hydrocarbons northeastward of the site. Analytical data from monitoring well <br /> MW-5 limits the extent of dissolved hydrocarbons north-westward of the site.Analytical data <br /> from'well MW-Tlimits'the extent of dissolved hydrocarbons east of the site. <br />' Advanced GeoEnvironmentai,Inc. <br />