Laserfiche WebLink
`'' Cr¢ological7"erluucslnc. ti-/ � <br /> Site Characterization Report Page 3 <br /> Project No. 1218.2 <br /> ,., February 9,2006 <br /> Up to four soil samples from each boring were submitted for laboratory analysis. A <br /> screening process was used to gather information through field observations. The field <br /> screening included: <br /> • Odor (measured via OVM, a portable photo ionization detector that uses a 10.6 eV lamp <br /> to detect compounds with ionization potential below 10.6 eV). <br /> LN • Sediment type, especially grain size and clay content <br /> • Moisture content <br /> • Visible evidence of contamination (i.e., color change due to reduction of iron or <br /> discoloration from hydrocarbons and other pollutants) <br /> Details on the geology encountered during the direct push survey, as well as the field <br /> �. observations, are included in Section 3.1, Geology and Field Observations. <br /> See Appendix C,Boring Logs for more information. <br /> 2.1.2 Soil Laboratory Analyses <br /> The soil samples collected were delivered to Castle Analytical Laboratory (California ELAP <br /> .r No. 2480), of Atwater, California, for the following analyses: <br /> • Benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene and xylene (BTEX) by EPA method 8015 <br /> • Gasoline range petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH-G)by EPA method 8015 <br /> • Diesel range petroleum hydrocarbons (TEPH-D) by EPA method 8015 <br /> The detection limits for these compounds are listed in the laboratory data sheets included in <br /> Appendix B and summarized in Table 1 of Appendix A. A Chain of Custody was completed <br /> for all samples collected and tracked to ensure sample integrity. <br /> 2.2 Groundwater Sampling <br /> No groundwater sampling was originally proposed in the investigation. However, the <br /> SIC/EHD required that groundwater samples be obtained in order to receive site closure <br /> concurrence. To investigate the presence of petroleum hydrocarbons in the groundwater at <br /> this site, a grab groundwater sample was obtained from the SB-3 borehole. GTI originally <br /> intended to obtain a groundwater sample from each borehole but the shallow rod refusal in <br /> `a the first borehole precluded obtaining a water sample from each hole within the scope of <br /> work budgeted. <br /> `' 2.2.1 Groundwater Sampling Procedure <br /> RSI staff advanced the rods to 58.5 feet bgs in SB-3 where a wet sand was encountered. The <br /> hole did not contain enough water to sample by small diameter, stainless steel bailer. It was <br /> 460 decided to pull the rods back 8 feet and let the hole sit through a lunch break. After lunch (20 <br /> minutes) the hole contained water to a static depth of approximately 50 feet bgs. <br /> Groundwater was carefully poured from the bailer into VOA vials and an amber one-liter <br /> `r bottle. The VOA vials were capped, inverted, tapped, and checked for headspace bubbles. <br /> k.. <br />