My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
B
>
BYRON
>
0
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0521880
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/14/2019 9:28:35 AM
Creation date
2/14/2019 8:43:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0521880
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0014864
FACILITY_NAME
TRACY-BYRON RD - TBR
STREET_NUMBER
0
STREET_NAME
BYRON
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95376
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
BYRON RD
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
WNg
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
162
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Lee Higgins -2- 10 August 2011 <br /> Chevron <br /> Tracy Byron Road <br /> of the project, respectively. The risk scenario for Areas 1 and 2 were evaluated in accordance <br /> with an onsite child or adult residential concept. Since affected soil in Area 3 lies <br /> predominately beneath the UPRR, Byron Road and/or active pipeline easement(s), SAIC <br /> considered the most likely exposure risk scenario to be for a construction worker. <br /> According to the Report, the HHSE was developed in accordance with the Preliminary <br /> Endangerment Assessment (PEA) Guidance Manual (California Environmental Protection <br /> Agency [Cal EPA] Department of Toxic Substances Control [DTSC], 1999, and the California <br /> Cancer Potency Factors and Chronic Reference Exposure Levels (Cal EPA - Office of <br /> Environmental Health and Hazard Assessment [OEHHA], 2011). An incremental lifetime <br /> cancer risk of 1 E-06 (i.e., 1 in 1 million), in accordance with the National Contingency Plan, is <br /> used as a point of departure for the HHSE. <br /> SAIC's HHSE findings determined that the potential onsite cancer risk and non-cancer health <br /> hazard exposure for the three areas as follows: <br /> • Area 1 - the total potential cancer risk to a hypothetical resident from oral, dermal, and <br /> inhalation exposures to onsite soil was determined to be 3E-06. This level of risk is <br /> above the de minimus level of 1 E-06, but is at the lower end of the risk management <br /> range of 1 E-6 to 1 E-04: <br /> The potential oral, dermal, and inhalation non-cancer health hazards from direct contact <br /> exposures to onsite soils for chemicals of potential concern for a hypothetical resident <br /> were summed; the non-cancer health hazard was determined to be 0.004 which is <br /> below the hazard index of 1. <br /> • Area 2 - the total potential cancer risk to a hypothetical resident from oral, dermal, and <br /> inhalation exposures to onsite soil was determined to be 9E-07. This level of risk is <br /> below the de minimus level of 1 E-06. <br /> The potential oral, dermal, and inhalation non-cancer health hazards from direct contact <br /> exposures to onsite soils for chemicals of potential concern for.a hypothetical resident <br /> were summed; the non-cancer health hazard was determined to be 0.005 which is <br /> below the hazard index of 1. <br /> • Area 3 - the total potential cancer risk to a hypothetical construction worker from oral, <br /> dermal, and inhalation exposures to onsite soil was determined to be 4E-07. This level <br /> of risk is below the de minimus level of 1 E-06. <br /> The potential oral, dermal, and inhalation non-cancer health hazards from direct contact <br /> exposures to onsite soil for chemicals of potential concern by a construction worker <br /> were summed; the non-cancer health hazard was determined to be 0.04 which is below <br /> the hazard index of 1. <br /> The shallow background water quality at the project exceeds State and Federal standards for <br /> total dissolved solids (TDS) for some drinking water and agricultural purposes. SAIC <br /> concluded the Site groundwater is not likely to be used as a drinking water source. Thus, the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.