FIELD DOCUMENTS - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

CITY OF STOCKTON REDE)-7LOPMENT AGENCY Page 1 of 2 LTCP Checklist ® GEOTRACKER HOME I MANAGE PROJECTS I REPORTS I SEARCH I OGO CITY OF STOCKTON REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY(T0607755189)-MAP THIS SITE OPEN-SITE ASSESSMENT 216 CALIFORNIA CLFANUa 0VERSIGH7 AGENCIES ACTIVITIES REPORT SANJOAQUINCOUNTY LOP(LEAD)-CASE If.0001687 STOCKTON,CA 95202 CASEWORKER:LISA MEDINA-SUPERVISOR:ADRIENNE ELLSAESSER SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY PUBLIC WEBPAGE CENTRAL VALLEY RWQCB(REGION 5S)-CASE#:391160 CASEWORKER:JAMES BARTON-SUPERVISOR:BRIAN NEWMAN VIEW PRINTABLE CASE SUMMARY FOR THIS SITE THIS PROJECT WAS LAST MODIFIED BY LISA MEDINA ON 5/21/2013 9:08:03 AM-F�$I J,Q,B.Y THIS SITE HAS SUBMITTALS.CLICK HERE TO OPEN A NEW WINDOW WITH THE SUBMITTAL APPROVAL PAGE FOR THIS SITE. CLOSURE POLICY THIS VERSION IS IN PROGRESS AS OF 1212812012 CHECKLIST INITIATED ON 12/28/2012 n nsURE PO UCY HISTORY General Criteria-The site satisfies the policy general criteria-CLEAR SECTION ANSWERS NO a.Is the unauthorized release located within the service area of a public waters stem? YES r NO Name of Water System: City of Stockton-Calwater b.The unauthorized release consists only of petroleum info. IYES r NO c.The unauthorized("primary")release from the UST system has been stopped. r' YES r NO d.Free product has been removed to the maximum extent practicable info. FP Not Encountered YES r NO e.A conceptual site model that assesses the nature,extent,and mobility of the release has been developed Eqf2j. Description(Check all that Apply): r GW Not Evaluated Groundwater Assessment Incomplete-Areal Extent of Contamination Not Defined F Groundwater Assessment Incomplete-Depth of Contamination Not Defined r Hydrogeology Not Adequately Defined f YES (- NO F Potential Receptors Not Identified F7 Soil Assessment Incomplete-Areal Extent Not Defined Soil Assessment Incomplete-Depth Unknown Soil Vapor Not Evaluated F-Other - f.Secondary source has been removed to the extent practicable info. : YES 17 NO g.Soil or groundwater has been tested for MTBE and results reported in accordance with Health and Safety Code Section ( Not Required l YES (- NO 25296.15. h.Does a nuisance exist,as defined by Water Code section 13050. r YES GNO 1.Media-Specific Criteria:Groundwater-The contaminant plume that exceeds water quality objectives is stable or decreasing in areal extent,and NO meets all of the additional characteristics of one of the five classes of sites listed below.-CLEAR SECTION ANSWERS ,.,C EXEMPTION-Soil Only Case(Release has not Affected Groundwater-Info) r YES ,y-n0 Does the site meet any of the Groundwater specific criteria scenarios? (' YES r' NO ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS-Please indicate only those conditions that do not meet the policy criteria: Plume Length(That Exceeds Water Quality Objectives): (->_100 Feet and<250 Feet r>_250 Feet and<1,000 Feet r i 1,000 Feet G Unknown Plume is Stable or Decreasing in AREAL Extent: r No r Unknown Free Product in Groundwater: C Yes r No r Unknown Free Product Has Been Removed to the Maximum Extent Practicable r No r Unknown For sites with free product,the Plume Has Been Stable or Decreasing for 5-Years(info): C No (-Unknown For sites with free product,owner Willing to Accept a Land Use Restriction(if required) C No r Unknown Free Product Extends Offsite C Yes r Unknown Benzene Concentration r>_1,000 Ng/I and<3,000 pg/I r z 3,000 Ng/I r Unknown MTBE Concentration (-t 1,000 Ng/I (--Unknown Nearest Supply Well(From Plume Boundary): C s 250 Feet r>250 Feet and 5 1,000 Feet .r Unknown Nearest Surface Water Body(From Plume Boundary): r 5 250 Feet r >250 Feet and 5 1,000 Feet r Unknown 2.Media Specific Criteria:Petroleum Vapor Intrusion to Indoor Air-The site is considered low-threat for the vapor-intrusion-to-air pathway if site- NO specific conditions satisfy items 2a,2b,Or 2c-CLEAR SECTION ANSWERS EXEMPTION-Active Commercial Petroleum Fueling Facility r YES W NO https:Hgeotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/regulators/screens/closure_policy.asp?global_id=TO... 6/21/2013