My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FIELD DOCUMENTS
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CALIFORNIA
>
602
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544148
>
FIELD DOCUMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/14/2019 5:39:52 PM
Creation date
2/14/2019 2:49:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
FIELD DOCUMENTS
RECORD_ID
PR0544148
PE
3526
FACILITY_ID
FA0005937
FACILITY_NAME
NEAL STALLWORTH AUTO DETAIL
STREET_NUMBER
602
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
CALIFORNIA
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95202
APN
13916509
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
602 N CALIFORNIA ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
WNg
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
439
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
31 October 2011 <br /> AGE-NC Project No. 99-0682 <br /> Page 5of9 <br /> of soil. Theoretically, the radius of influence of the injection points should increase rapidly <br /> at first, then gradually decline as the affected volume increases and the ORC-advanced <br /> ® media encounters decreasing hydrocarbon concentrations toward the margins of the <br /> hydrocarbon plume. Shorter-chain hydrocarbons are typically consumed first and longer- <br /> chain hydrocarbons later. <br /> ORC is considered to be a moderately favorable alternative to ozone sparging. However, <br /> ORC does not appear to be the best available technology based on the following. <br /> • Remediation at sites with similar soil compositions and hydrocarbon-impact <br /> typically takes between 24 and 48 months. <br /> • Adsorbed and dissolved concentrations at the site would generally require an initial <br /> dose of a stronger oxidant to reduce concentrations to levels where ORC can treat <br /> the plumes. <br /> • A large number of borings and several treatments would likely need to be performed <br /> to achieve cleanup goals. <br /> • Additional monitoring costs would be incurred to track the progress of the injections, <br /> driving up the overall cost to complete the project. <br /> 3.3. PHYSICAL/MECHANICAL TREATMENT <br /> AGE has evaluated two physical/mechanical treatment alternatives for the site, dual phase <br /> extraction and ground water extraction. <br /> The presence of dissolved hydrocarbons at the site would require treatment of any <br /> recoverable ground water. Two of the most common methods of water treatment are air <br /> stripping and carbon adsorption. Air stripping involves removal of volatile organic <br /> compounds from ground water by promoting the transfer of contaminants from the <br /> dissolved phase to the vapor phase. The process usually works well with volatile organic <br /> compounds, but less successfully with longer-chained hydrocarbons. Carbon adsorption <br /> utilizes granular activated carbon to simply"filter" organic compounds out of ground water. <br /> A third, but less common method of above-ground treatment of water is bioremediation. <br /> Contaminated ground water is "treated" by adding hydrocarbon-degrading microbes or by <br /> augmenting natural hydrocarbon degradation activities with the introduction of nutrients. <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmcntal,Inc. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.