Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> S ECOR <br /> Third Quarter 2003, Quarterly Progress Report <br /> • October 14, 2003 <br /> ' Wage 3 <br /> 3 2 Soil Vapor Extraction System <br /> ' The SVE system is comprised of four vapor wells (VE-1 through VE-4) connected by mechanical piping to <br /> a 5 horsepower (hp) positive-displacement blower and a catalytic oxidizer Vapors from the sod are <br /> removed under vacuum by the blower and petroleum hydrocarbons in these vapors are destroyed by a <br /> ' catalytic oxidizer, prior to discharging the air stream to the atmosphere The San Joaquin Valley Air <br /> Pollution Control District (SJVAPCD) permits the operation of the SVE system under permit No N-4343- <br /> 1-0 <br /> ' To assess the effectiveness of the SVE system, process samples were collected monthly from the vapor <br /> stream before (INFL) and after (EFFL) the catalytic oxidizer Each sample was analyzed for TPHg, <br /> BTEX, and MtBE Maximum constituent concentrations are presented below <br /> ' Sampling Maximum Constituent Concentration (ppmV) <br /> Location <br /> TPH Benzene Toluene Ethyl-benzene X lenes MtBE <br /> INFL 14 <05 <08 <04 1 <04 <br /> EFFL <1 0 <0 5 <0 8 <0 4 <0 7 <0 4 <br /> ' Ex ianatfans <br /> ppmV=Parts per million by volume <br /> <Indicates the constituent was not present al or above the method reporting limit shown <br /> ' During the 3Q03 the SVE system was approximately 98% operable until it was shut off on August 20, <br /> 2003 Tables 5 and 6 present operational measurements and calculated mass removal rates for TPHg, <br /> benzene, and MtBE Table 7 shows emission data for the SVE system <br /> During 3003 the SVE system removed approximately 5 6 pounds of TPHg and 0 1 pounds of benzene <br /> A concentration of one-half the laboratory detection limit was used to facilitate calculations when samples <br /> were reported as below detection limits Since operation began, the SVE system has removed an <br /> ' estimated 4,132 pounds of TPHg, 85 9 pounds of benzene, and 443 8 pounds of MtBE Mass removal <br /> trends and influent sod vapor TPHg, benzene, and MtBE concentrations versus time are shown on <br /> Figures 8 and 9, respectively <br /> ' 3.3 Hydrocarbon Mass Estimate <br /> The hydrocarbon mass estimates presented below are an update of results presented within the Problem <br /> Assessment Report/Final Remediation Plan (PAR/FRP) Addendum, dated June 5, 2001 Methodology <br /> for determining the mass of hydrocarbons adsorbed to soil and dissolved in groundwater can be found <br /> within the PAR/FRP Addendum <br />' 331 Estimated Mass of Petroleum Hydrocarbons Dissolved in Groundwater <br /> The results presented below are based on the calculation presented within the PAR/FRP Addendum and <br />' cumulative 3Q03 GWE mass removal data To conservatively estimate analyte mass remaining, <br /> historical groundwater analytical data was used This information is summarized in the following table <br /> 1 <br /> 11chevron1957751Penodic MomtonnglQ P R1200313rd Quarter-2003 QPR doc <br />