Laserfiche WebLink
Closure Appeal, <br /> Flag City Chevron,6421 Capitol Avenue,Lodi,California <br /> Page 4 of 5 <br /> 3) The mass of MTBE remaining in groundwater was incorrectly calculated and the result <br /> was a gross underestimation of MTBE remaining in groundwater at the site. This <br /> underestimated mass calculation was used in the risk model to close the Subject Property. <br /> The Closure Summary Report prepared by AGE dated August 31, 2005 calculates the mass of <br /> MTBE remaining in groundwater at the Subject Property at 1.75 pounds (Appendix M). There <br /> are multiple problems with this mass calculation. <br /> AGE uses a contaminated aquifer thickness of 20 feet (b=10 feet where b is half the thickness of <br /> the aquifer) and uses the equation for a conical shape to estimate the volume of the dissolved <br /> phase MTBE plume remaining at the Subject Property. However, Figure 14 in the Closure <br /> Summary Report illustrates the dissolved phase MTBE plume thickness at 80 feet consistently <br /> under the Subject Property. The thickness and shape errors in the calculation would increase the <br /> amount of dissolved phase MTBE in groundwater from 1.75 pounds to 14 pounds. It should be <br /> noted that only 13.33 pounds of MTBE was remediated from the site. <br /> Apex recommends correcting the mass of MTBE still remaining in groundwater under the <br /> Subject Property and rerunning the risk model. <br /> 4) The Closure Summary Report prepared by AGE dated August 31, 2005 states that <br /> natural groundwater flow direction is consistently to the north northeast. This direction is <br /> towards Gilbert and Eileen Moore's Flag City Shell well MW-6B which recently had a <br /> detection of MTBE and suggests the Flag City Chevron plume may be migrating. <br /> Apex prepared a Workplan for Monitoring Well Installations dated April 24, 2006 for the Gilbert <br /> and Eileen Moore's Flag City Shell site which was approved by the San Joaquin County <br /> Environmental Health Department on May 9, 2006. The workplan proposes that two wells are <br /> installed just to the northeast of the Subject Property. These wells should provide additional data <br /> on the migration of the dissolved phase plume. It would be premature to consider the Subject <br /> Property for closure until the new wells are installed and more information is acquired about the <br /> source of MTBE in well MW-6B. <br />