Laserfiche WebLink
' 30 October 2003 <br /> • AGE-NC Project No 96-0232 <br />' Page 9 of 15 <br />' In addition, ground water samples were collected from municipal water wells CSA-1, CSA-2 by <br /> opening a valve from each water well outlet sample port and allowing each well pump to turn on and <br /> operate for a minimum of 15 minutes to purge the wells and then collecting the running water <br />' directly into the sample containers <br />' 3 3 LABORATORY ANALYSIS OF GROUND WATER SAMPLES r <br /> Each ground water sample was logged on a chain-of-custody form,placed in a chilled container and <br />' transported to a California Department of Health Services (DHS)-certified laboratory for analysis <br /> for <br />' • TPH-g and TPH-d by EPA Methods 5030B/8015Cm and 3510C/8015C, respectively, and <br /> • MTBE by EPA Method 8260B <br /> 34 FINDINGS <br />' Ground water elevation, flow direction and gradient were determined from field data collected on <br /> 15 September 2003, the contaminant impact to ground water was quantified by laboratory analysis <br /> of water samples collected on 15, 16 and 17 September 2003 <br /> 3 4 1 Ground Water Elevation and Gradient <br /> The depths to groundwater were measured at between 13 14 feet(MW-18)and 17 07 feet(MW-9B) <br />' below the tops of the well casings on 15 September 2003, ground water elevations were calculated <br /> to be between 4 90 feet (MW-13B) and 5 68 feet (MW-2) below mean sea level (MSL) Ground <br /> water elevation at the site generally decreased an average 0 69 feet between the June and the <br /> September 2003 ground water monitoring events <br /> Ground water elevation data collected from Flag City Chevron wells MW-9 (A-C),MW-11 (A-D), <br /> IMW-13 (A-D), MW-16, MW-17, MW-18 and Three B's Truck Plaza wells MW-6, MW-9 (A-E) <br /> and MW-10 (A-F) on 15 September 2003 was depicted on cross section GC' (Figure 3), by <br /> determining the difference between ground water elevations (dh) and dividing by the difference of <br /> the screen interval midpoints (dl), the vertical gradient between adjacent screen intervals was <br /> calculated Generally,nearly flat,very slight upward and downward vertical gradients were observed <br /> I between the First Zone, Second Zone, Rocky's Upper Zone, Secondary Zone and Primary Zone <br /> screen intervals of all the above wells (Figure 3) <br /> Advanced GeoEnviromnental,Inc <br />