Laserfiche WebLink
(3 <br /> October 21, 2015 <br /> Reference: Response to California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Central Valley <br /> Regional Letter dated June 15, 2015 and Request for Additional Methane and Soil <br /> Gas VOC Investigation <br /> degradation of petroleum constituents being a potential threat to the apartment buildings <br /> and utility worker under conditions that may not have been anticipated (i.e. changing <br /> atmospheric conditions, varying HVAC operations in apartments, etc. . The report <br /> recommends methane monitoring during any future sub-surface disturbance; however, <br /> this would need to be recorded in a deed covenant on the property to require methane <br /> monitoring during any future soil disturbance activities. Since this option is very unlikely to <br /> occur given that the L&M Group does not own the property and the high methane levels <br /> are still considered to be a potential threat to the apartment buildings and utility workers, <br /> the work plan needs to address reducing methane caused by degradation of petroleum <br /> constituents to levels below the 5%LEL. <br /> Stantec demonstrated in Section 4.3 of the soil vapor assessment report submitted May15, 2015 <br /> that the observed methane in soil vapor from all locations monitored was well below the 5% LEL <br /> threshold that would pose an immediate concern to residents and/or the commercial and <br /> utility/maintenance worker. Based on the 37 point survey of confined accessible spaces, <br /> methane was measured at very low levels; far less than 1% LEL, and nowhere near 5% LEL (50,000 <br /> ppmv). The highest concentration measured was 1,300 ppmV. In response to CVRWQCB <br /> comments and to address concerns regarding methane levels "at depth", Stantec is proposing <br /> additional sampling to further assess site-wide methane levels in shallow soil gas, investigation as <br /> outlined in the work plan below. <br /> 4. Regarding the request to suspend the quarterly soil vapor monitoring, the quarterly <br /> monitoring should continue so that the data ore available for use in further assessment of <br /> the work to be performed to address the areas with TPH-g and methane, and to make sure <br /> that only UPSV-6 and APSV-15 are of concern for benzene and/or naphthalene. <br /> Stantec will continue with quarterly soil vapor monitoring, beginning with the third quarter of 2015 <br /> (a second quarter soil vapor monitoring was not conducted). Soil vapor sampling was performed <br /> on July 1 sl and 2nd; and the data were presented in the second quarter 2015, site status report <br /> submitted July 31, 2015. However, Stantec requests that after the proposed additional soil gas <br /> investigations as outlined below and beginning 1Q16 that soil gas sampling be conducted on a <br /> semi-annual basis. Data collected to date indicates that this frequency of sampling would be <br /> adequate for aiding RWQCB risk-management decisions. <br /> 3 <br />