My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FIELD DOCUMENTS
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CARNEGIE
>
555
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0505723
>
FIELD DOCUMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/22/2019 12:31:03 PM
Creation date
2/22/2019 11:39:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
FIELD DOCUMENTS
RECORD_ID
PR0505723
PE
2950
FACILITY_ID
FA0006962
STREET_NUMBER
555
STREET_NAME
CARNEGIE
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
MANTECA
Zip
95337-6102
APN
22119064
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
555 CARNEGIE ST
P_LOCATION
04
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
WNg
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
197
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
' 0 <br /> 4 . GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION <br /> ' In order to choose boring locations for sampling groundwater up- <br /> and down-gradient from suspected source areas of contamination, <br /> it was necessary to determine the flow direction of groundwater. <br /> ' Therefore, borings B-1 through B-3 were drilled first, on October <br /> 20, and top-of-casing elevations were leveled. After stabilizing <br /> overnight, depths to water were measured with an electronic depth <br /> gauge on the morning of October 21 . The table below lists rela- <br /> tive top-of-casing elevations (Etoc) , depths to water (DTW) , and <br /> water elevation (Ew) , on the morning of October 21, 1994 . <br /> BORING Etoc DTW Ew <br /> B-1 94 . 79 22 . 92 71 . 87 <br /> B-2 96 . 05 23 . 99 72 . 06 <br /> ' B-3 95 . 85 23 . 85 72 . 00 <br /> *Etoc assuming level had elevation of 100 feet <br /> iThese water elevations were used to compute the flow azimuth in <br /> the vicinity of the three borings, which was 1870 (S 70 W) , as <br /> ' plotted in Figure 2 . <br /> 5 . CHEMICAL ANALYSES <br /> 5 . 1 Priority Metals and Cyanide <br /> Priority metals and cyanide analyses, listed in Table 1, were of <br /> principal concern due to the electroplating operations conducted <br /> ' by Shinko. All nine samples collected for chemical analysis were <br /> tested for 13 priority metals (EPA Method 6010) and for cyanide <br /> (EPA Method 9010) . <br /> In all five soil samples, arsenic, cadmium, selenium, thallium, <br /> silver, and mercury were not detected (shown in Table 1 as <br /> ND< #, with # representing the value of the detection limit) . <br /> ' The remaining six metals were present at low levels, with zinc <br /> having the highest concentration, up to 56 mg/kg. These are <br /> considered background concentration levels for soils in the San <br /> ' Joaquin Valley. <br /> Among the four water samples, only three metals were detected -- <br /> chromium, copper, and zinc -- and these were extremely low in <br /> ' concentration. Zinc was the highest, up to 0 .30 mg/1, while <br /> chromium and copper were less than or equal to 0 . 010 mg/1 . These <br /> concentrations are considered to represent background levels . It <br /> is noteworthy that groundwater from borings B-2 and B-4, located <br /> up- and down-gradient of the chemical operations area, had essen- <br /> ' 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.