My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FIELD DOCUMENTS AND WORK PLANS 1987
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WAGNER
>
200
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0009002
>
FIELD DOCUMENTS AND WORK PLANS 1987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/22/2019 5:04:55 PM
Creation date
2/22/2019 2:32:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
FIELD DOCUMENTS
FileName_PostFix
AND WORK PLANS 1987
RECORD_ID
PR0009002
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0004040
FACILITY_NAME
SPX COOLING TECHNOLOGIES INC
STREET_NUMBER
200
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
WAGNER
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95215
APN
14331007
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
200 N WAGNER AVE
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
TMorelli
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
295
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Marley Cooling Tower <br /> Page 2 <br /> essential element, and because the authors felt that 5.3 mg was a very <br /> conservative LOAEL. <br /> If a child were to ingest a mouthful of this soil, he might absorb enough copper <br /> to cause toxic effects to the gastrointestinal tract, such as gastric pain and <br /> diarrhea. This is assuming that the copper is in a readily absorbable form. <br /> However, the copper is probably in a complexed form and would not be easily <br /> absorbable. <br /> The level of chromium is well below the acute NOAEL for rats, which is 14.4 <br /> mg/kg/d. <br /> The highest soil level of arsenic (253 ppm) is well above the background for <br /> Stockton (<0.35 ppm) based on the samples taken by Bob Shlag at two locations <br /> remote from the site. If all the arsenic present on the site was arsenic <br /> trioxide (trivalent arsenic) the maximum level detected could represent a <br /> potentially dangerous level to children ingesting 10 gm of this soil, however, <br /> the arsenic is probably in the form of arsenic pentoxide (pentavalent arsenic) <br /> rather than arsenic trioxide. Arsenic pentoxide is much less toxic than arsenic <br /> trioxide having a human oral LD50 of 55 mg/kg compared to 1.4 mg/kg for arsenic <br /> trioxide. <br /> Chronic and Subchronic Effects <br /> The chromium found in the soil samples was not speciated into Cr VI and Cr III. <br /> Cr VI is much more toxic than Cr III. <br /> Arsenic and chromium VI are carcinogenic. The other metals are non-carcinogens. <br /> TSCD has produced a draft document entitled "The Development of Applied Action <br /> Levels for Soil Contact. " In this document it is estimated that an individual is <br /> exposed to the contaminants in 0.71 g/day of soil as a lifetime average (0.14 g/d <br /> from ingestion and 0.57 g/d from dermal contact) . Human exposure to Cr, Cu and <br /> Zn was calculated based on the estimate of 0.71 g/d provided by TSCD. <br /> Exposure (mg/d) AIS (mg/d) AIC (mg/d) <br /> Chromium .85 1.75 0.35 <br /> Copper .47 2.6 2.6 <br /> Zinc 1.0 14.7 14.7 <br /> AIS and AIC are acceptable intake levels based on subchronic and chronic effects. <br /> The AIS is the highest human intake of a chemical that does not cause adverse <br /> effects when exposure is short-term (but not acute) . The AIS is usually based on <br /> subchronic animal studies. The AIC is the highest human intake of a chemical <br /> that does not cause adverse effects when exposure is long-term (lifetime) . The <br /> AIC is usually based on chronic animal studies. The AIS and AIC shown for <br /> chromium are based on Cr VI toxicity. The corresponding numbers for Cr III are <br /> much higher. There are no AIS or AIC numbers for arsenic, because arsenic is a <br /> carcinogen. For carcinogens there is no intake level which can be regarded as <br /> having no adverse effect. Chromium VI has been shown to be carcinogenic by <br /> inhalation but not by ingestion, so there are AIS and AIC values for Cr VI for <br /> the oral route, but none for the inhalation route. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.