My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE FILE 2
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CENTER
>
139
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544169
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE FILE 2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/22/2019 9:41:52 PM
Creation date
2/22/2019 2:39:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
FILE 2
RECORD_ID
PR0544169
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0006437
FACILITY_NAME
CHEVRON STATION #90557*** (INACT)
STREET_NUMBER
139
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
CENTER
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95202
APN
13730012
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
139 S CENTER ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
WNg
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
380
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
c <br /> Vicki McCartney <br /> From: Jim Barton [BartonJ@rb5s.swrcb.ca.gov] <br /> Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 3:32 PM <br /> To: Mae Hoe; Vicki McCartney <br /> Cc: Cori Condon; Margaret Lagorio <br /> Subject: RE: Methods Used to Analyze Samples <br /> Vickie, <br /> Thanks for providing Mae's response in your email. I will confirm your <br /> conversation with Mae. Feel free to continue emailing me with your <br /> questions, and I will coordinate a response with our staff as <br /> necessary. <br /> Jim Barton <br /> >>> "Vicki McCartney" <vmccartney@sjcehd.com> 02/10/03 03:18PM >>> <br /> Jim, <br /> 1 from Mae Hoe this afternoon concerning I had a cal g methods used for <br /> analyzing air samples, and EPA method 8015B for analyzing diesel and <br /> motor oil. I want to thank Mae Hoe for the quick response to my e-mail. <br /> It is my understanding that the following information is correct based <br /> on our telephone conversation. <br /> Mae Hoe agreed that EPA methods 8021, 8260B, and LUFT are not <br /> appropriate methods for analyzing air samples. I plan to contact the <br /> consulting firms and request that the laboratory reports be revised to <br /> indicate the appropriate methods. <br /> Mae Hoe indicated that a laboratory must run a curve for diesel and <br /> another curve for motor oil as opposed to running a single curve <br /> containing carbon 8 through carbon 40 and reporting quantities for <br /> diesel and motor oil based on the response factors generated from the <br /> carbon 8-40 curve. I plan to contact the consulting firm and request <br /> that the laboratory provide a five-point curve for diesel and a <br /> five-point curve for motor oil and report the results based on the <br /> appropriate curves. <br /> Please confirm with Mae Hoe that these conclusions are correct. <br /> Thank you, Jim. <br /> Vicki McCartney, SJCEHS <br /> 304 E. Weber Avenue <br /> Stockton, CA 95202-2708 <br /> Phone (209) 468-3456 <br /> Fax (209) 468-3433 <br /> vmccartney@sjcehd.com <br /> -----Original Message----- <br /> From: Jim Barton [mailto:BartonJ@rb5s.swrcb.ca.gov] <br /> Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 10:05 AM <br /> To: Vicki McCartney <br /> Cc: Margaret Lagorio <br /> Subject: Re: Methods Used to Analyze Samples <br /> Vicki, <br /> I've requested that our chemist Mae Hoe review this email and get back <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.