Laserfiche WebLink
Former Chevron Service Station 9-0557 Page 3 <br /> 139 South Center Street May 6, 2010 <br /> Stockton, California <br /> (southeast) direction. Impacted soil is well delineated toward the west-southwest to sixty feet <br /> bsg by data from the soil boring for MW-6, and is delineated toward the north-northwest to <br /> depths as great as twenty-five feet bsg by data from soil boring SB-5, and toward the east- <br /> northeast to forty-three feet bsg by data from soil borings SB-1 and thirty-six feet bsg by data <br /> from soil boring SB-6. <br /> In addition to the contaminants of concern noted for soil, groundwater was found to be <br /> impacted by TPH quantified as motor oil (TPH-mo), tertiary-butyl alcohol TBA), ethylene <br /> dibromide (EDB) and 1,2-dichloroethane (1,2-DCA). Impacted groundwater occurs from the <br /> water table (varying from approximately twenty-one to forty-seven feet bsg) to depths as great <br /> as one-hundred five feet bsg (MW-18D2) and one-hundred sixteen feet bsg (grab <br /> groundwater sample CPT5-W-116). The lateral extent of impacted groundwater in the down- <br /> gradient direction reaches as far as monitoring well MW-7, approximately one-hundred thirty- <br /> five feet from the former MW-9S. Laterally from the former USTs removed in 1990, the plume <br /> of impacted groundwater is delineated in the moderately shallow zones toward the west- <br /> southwest by data from monitoring well MW-6 screened thirty-five to sixty feet bsg; north- <br /> northwest by MW-12 screened seventeen to thirty-two feet bsg and MW-16 screened twenty <br /> to thirty feet bsg; north-northeast by MW-3 screened thirty-five to sixty feet bsg; east by <br /> MW-10 screened seventeen to thirty-two feet bsg and MW-14 screened twenty to thirty feet <br /> bsg; southeast by MW-5 screened thirty-five to sixty feet bsg; and south-southeast by MW-8 <br /> screened twenty-two to forty-two feet bsg, MW-7 screened thirty-two to fifty-two feet bsg, and <br /> MW-13 screened approximately eighteen to thirty-three feet bsg. <br /> HFA compared the various contaminant concentrations to the environmental screening levels <br /> (ESLs) established by the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board to <br /> evaluate the health risk and hazard posed by the residual contamination. Locally soil has <br /> been impacted by TPH-g and BTEX at concentrations that exceed the ESLs; groundwater is <br /> or has been impacted by the same contaminants of concern as soil and by TPH-mo, TBA, <br /> EDB, and 1,2-DCA at concentrations that exceed the ESLs but HFA argues that the exposure <br /> pathways are not complete and that the impacted soil and groundwater present little risk or <br /> hazard to human health and the environment. <br /> As the site is currently a vacant lot, zoned for commercial use, but with no development plans <br /> in place, HFA concluded that there is no completed exposure pathway and did not evaluate <br /> the potential for vapor intrusion. HFA states that Chevron will perform such an evaluation <br /> should the site be proposed to be put into use. <br /> Three field tests were conducted to evaluate potential remediation technologies to identify the <br /> most feasible and cost effective technology for possible use on the site to reduce contaminant <br /> mass in soil and groundwater and to bring the site more rapidly to regulatory closure. The <br /> tests reported in FS were an aquifer pumping test, an ozone injection test, and a two-phase <br /> extraction (TPE) test. Remediation by monitoring natural attenuation (MNA) was discussed. <br /> It was concluded in FS that groundwater extraction (GWE), TPE, and ozone injection would <br /> not be likely to be cost effective due to the contaminants of concern occurring predominantly <br /> in fine-grained soil in the saturated zone; HFA recommended use of MNA to remediate the <br /> impacted soil and groundwater. <br />