My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE FILE 2
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CENTER
>
139
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544169
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE FILE 2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/22/2019 9:41:52 PM
Creation date
2/22/2019 2:39:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
FILE 2
RECORD_ID
PR0544169
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0006437
FACILITY_NAME
CHEVRON STATION #90557*** (INACT)
STREET_NUMBER
139
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
CENTER
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95202
APN
13730012
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
139 S CENTER ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
WNg
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
380
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Former Chevron Service Station 9-0557 Page 3 <br /> 139 South Center Street May 6, 2010 <br /> Stockton, California <br /> (southeast) direction. Impacted soil is well delineated toward the west-southwest to sixty feet <br /> bsg by data from the soil boring for MW-6, and is delineated toward the north-northwest to <br /> depths as great as twenty-five feet bsg by data from soil boring SB-5, and toward the east- <br /> northeast to forty-three feet bsg by data from soil borings SB-1 and thirty-six feet bsg by data <br /> from soil boring SB-6. <br /> In addition to the contaminants of concern noted for soil, groundwater was found to be <br /> impacted by TPH quantified as motor oil (TPH-mo), tertiary-butyl alcohol TBA), ethylene <br /> dibromide (EDB) and 1,2-dichloroethane (1,2-DCA). Impacted groundwater occurs from the <br /> water table (varying from approximately twenty-one to forty-seven feet bsg) to depths as great <br /> as one-hundred five feet bsg (MW-18D2) and one-hundred sixteen feet bsg (grab <br /> groundwater sample CPT5-W-116). The lateral extent of impacted groundwater in the down- <br /> gradient direction reaches as far as monitoring well MW-7, approximately one-hundred thirty- <br /> five feet from the former MW-9S. Laterally from the former USTs removed in 1990, the plume <br /> of impacted groundwater is delineated in the moderately shallow zones toward the west- <br /> southwest by data from monitoring well MW-6 screened thirty-five to sixty feet bsg; north- <br /> northwest by MW-12 screened seventeen to thirty-two feet bsg and MW-16 screened twenty <br /> to thirty feet bsg; north-northeast by MW-3 screened thirty-five to sixty feet bsg; east by <br /> MW-10 screened seventeen to thirty-two feet bsg and MW-14 screened twenty to thirty feet <br /> bsg; southeast by MW-5 screened thirty-five to sixty feet bsg; and south-southeast by MW-8 <br /> screened twenty-two to forty-two feet bsg, MW-7 screened thirty-two to fifty-two feet bsg, and <br /> MW-13 screened approximately eighteen to thirty-three feet bsg. <br /> HFA compared the various contaminant concentrations to the environmental screening levels <br /> (ESLs) established by the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board to <br /> evaluate the health risk and hazard posed by the residual contamination. Locally soil has <br /> been impacted by TPH-g and BTEX at concentrations that exceed the ESLs; groundwater is <br /> or has been impacted by the same contaminants of concern as soil and by TPH-mo, TBA, <br /> EDB, and 1,2-DCA at concentrations that exceed the ESLs but HFA argues that the exposure <br /> pathways are not complete and that the impacted soil and groundwater present little risk or <br /> hazard to human health and the environment. <br /> As the site is currently a vacant lot, zoned for commercial use, but with no development plans <br /> in place, HFA concluded that there is no completed exposure pathway and did not evaluate <br /> the potential for vapor intrusion. HFA states that Chevron will perform such an evaluation <br /> should the site be proposed to be put into use. <br /> Three field tests were conducted to evaluate potential remediation technologies to identify the <br /> most feasible and cost effective technology for possible use on the site to reduce contaminant <br /> mass in soil and groundwater and to bring the site more rapidly to regulatory closure. The <br /> tests reported in FS were an aquifer pumping test, an ozone injection test, and a two-phase <br /> extraction (TPE) test. Remediation by monitoring natural attenuation (MNA) was discussed. <br /> It was concluded in FS that groundwater extraction (GWE), TPE, and ozone injection would <br /> not be likely to be cost effective due to the contaminants of concern occurring predominantly <br /> in fine-grained soil in the saturated zone; HFA recommended use of MNA to remediate the <br /> impacted soil and groundwater. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.