Laserfiche WebLink
SIATt OF CALIFORNIA PETE WILSON, Governor <br /> CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD— <br /> CENTRAL VALLEY REGION <br /> 3443 ROUTIER ROAD, SUITE A <br /> SACRAMENTO, CA 95827-3098 <br /> PHONE: (916) 361-5600 <br /> FAX: (916) 361-5686 <br /> OCT 03 9391 <br /> 30 September 1991 - I lv;rl �11 <br /> Mr. David Bates <br /> Marley Cooling Tower Company <br /> 5800 Foxridge Drive <br /> Mission, Kansas 66201 <br /> REPORT OF WASTE DISCHARGE, MARLEY COOLING TOWER COMPANY, SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> We have receive the Report of Waste Discharge (RWD) submitted on 6 August 1991 <br /> for the Marley Cooling Tower Company (Marley) site in Stockton. The RWD was <br /> submitted for the expansion of the ground water treatment system to increase <br /> flows to approximately 500 gallons per minute. <br /> Currently, the annual fee for your discharge is $1300. The annual statements are <br /> sent out by the State Water Resources Control Board (State Board) . The annual <br /> fee schedule has been proposed to be increased, but is not yet finaled. <br /> We have reviewed the RWD and have found that it is not complete and needs to be <br /> amended to include detailed information for: <br /> 1. The high strength pretreatment system from the subsurface soil flushing <br /> system. <br /> 2. Use of the treated ground water in the full scale soil flushing treatment <br /> system. <br /> 3. Operational reliability prior to system automation. <br /> 4. Water quality data of the receiving water upstream from the discharge. <br /> On 31 January 1991, we notified you that information on the high strength <br /> treatment system must be included in the RWD. This system is proposed for <br /> pretreatment for the electrochemical reduction and precipitation of the high <br /> chromium waste stream (Andco system) and may be installed in the near future. <br /> To avoid an additional revision of the permit, we again request that the RWD be <br /> amended to include the information on the pretreatment system now so that the <br /> current revision of the permit can incorporate this system, if and when <br /> installed. <br /> We understand that the full-scale operation for the subsurface soil flushing <br /> system will use the treated storm and ground water through injection into the <br /> unsaturated zone. We approve of this disposal of the treated effluent and <br /> commend Marley for considering recycling of this valuable resource. However, the <br />