Laserfiche WebLink
c Cancer SurveillaSe Program <br /> S 12800 L Street, #440 <br /> P Sacramento, CA 95816-5600 <br /> September 21, 2000 <br /> Donna Heran,Director <br /> Environmental Health Division <br /> 304 E. Weber Ave., Third Fl. fig Un;� <br /> Stockton, CA 95202 0 E)-4qA <br /> Dear Ms. Heran; <br /> This letter is in response to your request for information about cancer incidence in the vicinity of the <br /> Marley Cooling Tower in Stockton. The Cancer Surveillance Program, as Region 3 of the California <br /> Cancer Registry, collects information about cancer diagnosed among the approximately 2.9 million <br /> residents of thirteen counties in the Sacramento area. One of the uses of cancer registry data is to <br /> evaluate incidence of cancer, and to assess whether the number of new cancer cases is greater than the <br /> number that would be expected for a population. <br /> The census tract is the geographic division for which we have detailed 1990 population data and is the <br /> unit that we usually use to assess cancer incidence. The geographic area around the plant(according to <br /> the map you supplied)is contained in four census tracts (2600, 2701, 2702, and 3700)that include the <br /> area north of Highway 4 and east of Highway 99. These census tracts had a combined population in <br /> 1990 of approximately 12,000 people, although the population is likely to have changed since then. <br /> Based on my calculations using the 1990 age, race and sex-specific population figures and the <br /> corresponding regional cancer rates, the number of cases of cancer that would be expected in this <br /> neighborhood over a ten-year period is 484. According to registry records, the number of cases that <br /> were diagnosed among residents of this census tract in the ten-year period 1988 through 1997 was 490, <br /> almost exactly the number that would be expected. Similar to the rest of the state, the most frequently <br /> diagnosed cancers among residents were lung, breast, colorectal and prostate cancer. <br /> I also did not observe any excess incidence of the cancers that you suggested might be expected to be <br /> elevated with exposure to hexavalent chrome in drinking water. I calculated expected versus observed <br /> numbers for cancers of the esophagus, stomach, kidney and renal pelvis, and liver. For none of these <br /> cancers was the observed number of cases during the ten year period significantly higher than the <br /> number expected. <br /> I hope this information is helpful. Let me know if I can be of further assistance. <br /> Sincerel <br /> Rosemary Donalds Cress, DrPH <br /> Epidemiologist <br /> cc: <br /> Karen Furst, MD, MPH, San Joaquin County Department of Health <br /> Dr. William Wright,California Dept. of Health Services, Cancer Surveillance Section <br /> Cynthia Creech, Cancer Surveillance Program <br /> Region 3 of the California Cancer Registry <br /> Telephone: 916-454-6522 <br /> FAX: 916.454-6523 <br />