My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FIELD DOCUMENTS AND WORK PLANS 2004-2014
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WAGNER
>
200
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0009002
>
FIELD DOCUMENTS AND WORK PLANS 2004-2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/22/2019 7:04:53 PM
Creation date
2/22/2019 3:01:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
FIELD DOCUMENTS
FileName_PostFix
AND WORK PLANS 2004-2014
RECORD_ID
PR0009002
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0004040
FACILITY_NAME
SPX COOLING TECHNOLOGIES INC
STREET_NUMBER
200
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
WAGNER
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95215
APN
14331007
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
200 N WAGNER AVE
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
TMorelli
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
239
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CALIFORNIA41EGIONAL WATER QUALITY CAROL BOARD <br /> CENTRAL VALLEY REGION <br /> ACL COMPLAINT NO. R5-2005-0508 <br /> ADMINISTRATIVE CIVIL LIABILITY COMPLAINT <br /> IN THE MATTER OF <br /> MARLEY COOLING TOWER COMPANY <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> This complaint is issued to the Marley Cooling Tower Company, (hereafter Discharger)based on <br /> a finding of violations of NPDES Waste Discharge Requirements Order No. 93-221 (NPDES <br /> No. CA0081787),pursuant to California Water Code (CWC) Section 13385, which authorizes <br /> the imposition of Administrative Civil Liability, and CWC Section 13323, which authorizes the <br /> Executive Officer to issue this complaint. <br /> The Executive Officer of the Regional Water Quality Control Board, Central Valley Region <br /> (Regional Board) finds, with respect to the Discharger's acts, or failure to act, the following: <br /> I. The Discharger owns and operates a groundwater extraction and treatment facility, which <br /> extracts groundwater polluted with chromium, treats the polluted water by removing the <br /> chromium, and discharges the treated water. The treated water is discharged to the <br /> Stockton Diverting Canal, a water of the United States. <br /> 2. On 22 October 1993 the Regional Board adopted Waste Discharge Requirements Order No. <br /> 93-221 (NPDES No. CA0081787)prescribing waste discharge requirements for the Marley <br /> Cooling Tower Company groundwater extraction and treatment facility. <br /> 3. Between the close of business on 16 September and the morning of 17 September 2002, the <br /> pH control system for the treatment plant failed. The pH meter controlling the pH <br /> adjustment pump, which delivers caustic to treatment plant effluent, began providing a <br /> false"low"pH signal which in turn caused the pH adjustment pump to continuously <br /> operate. This resulted in the release of approximately 2160 gallons (estimated maximum <br /> amount) of 50%by weight sodium hydroxide into approximately 222,066 gallons of treated <br /> water which was discharged as effluent into the Stockton Diverting Canal. This high pH <br /> discharge in turn raised the pH in the canal, measured by DeltaKeeper on September 19, <br /> 2002 at a pH of 10.8, causing a significant fish kill. According to DFG field estimates, <br /> approximately 1,000 dead fish were noted, and the total number estimated to be killed was <br /> 4,000 to 5,000. The fish included black bass, catfish,buffalo carp, Sacramento suckers, <br /> bluegill, and assorted smaller sunfish-type fish. Tadpoles and crayfish were also killed. <br /> 4. The discharge violated the pH effluent limitations of Order No. 93-221 set forth in B.2 <br /> which states "the discharge shall not have a pH less than 6.5 nor greater than 8.5". <br /> 5. The discharge violated receiving water quality prohibitions of Order No. 93-221 as set forth <br /> in items EA and E.9. Section EA states, "the discharge shall not cause concentrations of <br /> any materials in the receiving waters which are deleterious to human, aquatic, or plant <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.