Laserfiche WebLink
FEE IN <br /> ewf ', 3 <br /> NM <br /> q <br /> pa <br /> Pro ect!Number. SM175{z .72 <br /> Conwttant Prosd Member. 203 1153291 <br /> Contr.lct Member N46C WOD244-ax <br /> Facility Number. 00651 <br /> wwiborderNumber 1)004125 <br /> Report LBue tate: Apdf 11.19W <br /> QA Conformance Summary <br /> Purgeable Aromatics and Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons <br /> as Gasoline In Soll <br /> EPA Method 8020/8015 <br /> 1.0 Blanks <br /> Five of 5 target compounds were below detection limits in the reagent water blank and reagent <br /> methanol blank as shown to Tables 2a and 2b. <br /> 2.0 IDdeDendent QC Check <br /> The control limits were met for 4 out of 4 QC check compounds as shown In Table 3. <br /> 3.0 S1u=ate Cem2pund Recoveries <br /> Percent recovery 11mits were met for the surrogate compound (naphthalene) for 13 of 17 <br /> samples as shown in Table 4. <br /> 4.0 Matrix Sg1ke{m d Matrix Spike icate "$91 Ag " <br /> 4.1 Percent recovery limits were met for4 of 4 compounds 1n the MS and MSD as shown In Table <br /> 5. <br /> 4.2 Relative percent difference [RPD)criteria was mel for 4 of 4 analytes In the MS and MSD as <br /> shown In Table 5. <br /> 5.0 Samp!g Handling <br /> 5.1 Sample handling and hLiding time criteria were met for all samples. <br /> 5.2 There were exceptional conditions requiring dilution of samples. <br /> GTELConcord,CA Page 3 017 <br /> DW4 GTE L <br /> -- p004126.[)OC <br /> INVI ION Y IN rAt - <br /> ® IAI00A1001M INC. <br />