Laserfiche WebLink
w. KIM rr «. .an' +} "r xr k •.Fs i.mss:za etc +e j,.e sear n.._ -.rte <br /> 7� =+ ¢9i .i'•.�, ���`«`:�-�' i. � :e^ �. .41~I "" '�:��,.t.� +:.�_ w�f"_ �?a.�'�� a'r-r '�^�:M �•'tr��'�?., +'s�.'F='k�,. -a .:.ri='���- ..z' <br /> r <br /> Cane:W1 pro act NumOa SFB 1�S pq.T2 <br /> tci Nt,, 203 iT <br /> %:< m rJlrmSer X44 X <br /> F.Ic3lNy t+klmbtr; tiW657 <br /> W1111 rdtr Numbtr: D004120 <br /> RiPorl WOO We: AprU 1t1,19&0 <br /> OA Conformance Summary <br /> Purgaabte Hydrocarbons In Sol <br /> EPA Method 8240 <br /> 1.0 B13o <br /> One of 39 target compounds found In Reagent water blank and McOH blank as shown to <br /> Tables 2 and 2a <br /> 2.0 n I r <br /> The control 11MItsWere met for`3 of 8 QC check compounds In the aqueous QC check <br /> sample as shownown in Table 3. <br /> 3.0 , <br /> Recovery Itmfts were met for all three surrogate compotlnds for all samples as shown In <br /> Tabl-s 4a,4b,and 4c. <br /> 4.0 4.1 ! ri t nl! r <br /> �M. r I <br /> Percent recovery limits were mei for 10 of 1p com <br /> Table S. po;rnds In the MS and MSD as shown In <br /> 4.2 I I <br /> Relative <br /> MSD as shown nent T able 5.s SPD)criteria were met for 5 of 5 compote ds In the MS and <br /> 5.0 <br /> 5.1 Salmpie handling and holding time trite - <br /> 5.2 There were no exceptional conditions requiring dilution of samples. <br /> / <br /> GTEL Concord,CA <br /> D004128-DW Page 3 0l 12 MGTEL <br /> ENVIEONYEIr rAI <br /> LABOPA10911!• INC, <br />