Laserfiche WebLink
100,000 100,000 1 000 <br /> Total and Hexavalent Chromium Iron and Manganese Arsenic <br /> .; <br /> NUNN <br /> MMMMMM <br /> EMU <br /> 10,000 �Total Chromium <br /> 10,000 eKEE <br /> Hexavalent Chromium sKEE <br /> J ——— WQO for Chromium(50 Ng/L) <br /> 1 000 a 100 <br /> z s <br /> eKEE <br /> KETEMETEM <br /> �l�i�illllllhl 1,000 J <br /> oKEE <br /> 44444444 <br /> ` <br /> s <br /> i 100 J ® -- — `---- ---------- <br /> E EMT <br /> ° s <br /> 100 o <br /> c KE <br /> ._ <br /> ° 1p ° -- -------- ------------- � 10 <br /> U (� L <br /> W <br /> L <br /> --� CEMETME <br /> f Iron vKEE <br /> d <br /> v 10Manganese <br /> C <br /> C <br /> 1 --- WQO for Iron(300 Ng/L) U <br /> '044,04,44,44 04 <br /> O <br /> U --- WQOfor Manganese(50ug/L) ET <br /> .............................. ... <br /> 0 0 <br /> --- WQOforArseni <br /> ........... <br /> ��� <br /> Arsenic 10NgL <br /> "� <br /> ,.e <br /> 0.1 1 1 ............. .. . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <br /> Jan. 2008 Jan. 2009 Jan. 2010 Jan. 2011 Jan. 2012 Jan. 2013 Jan. 2008 Jan. 2009 Jan. 2010 Jan. 2011 Jan. 2012 Jan. 2013 Jan. 2008 Jan. 2009 Jan. 2010 Jan. 2011 Jan. 2012 Jan. 2013 <br /> 10,000 Sulfate 10 000 ag Total Organic Carbon 10,000 Total Dissolved Solids and Electrical Conductivity <br /> l _...... <br /> M EMT <br /> M EMT <br /> K! EMT 1,000 <br /> 1,000 ...o _ <br /> o <br /> s <br /> J i :, <br /> EMT 00 <br /> -�.� - ---�-- ------- -�, 3100 T EMT1 <br /> EEMT p - ------ <br /> c 100HT <br /> �- �_ <br /> R o <br /> 10 w <br /> :I c 100 <br /> cd <br /> o :I <br /> c <br /> 10 <br /> v E <br /> U s <br /> O <br /> _... g <br /> EMT <br /> _... o <br /> U = <br /> s <br /> O --4—TDS <br /> EC <br /> WQO for Sulfate(250 mg/L) <br /> 1 lil8ia 0 10 <br /> WQO for TDS(450 mg/L) <br /> r� rrrr ®— <br /> Jan. 2008 Jan. 2009 Jan. 2010 Jan. 2011 Jan. 2012 Jan. 2013 Jan. 2008 Jan. 2009 Jan. 2010 Jan. 2011 Jan. 2012 Jan. 2013 Jan. 2008 Jan. 2009 Jan. 2010 Jan. 2011 Jan. 2012 Jan. 2013 <br /> 12 PH soo N Oxidation-Reduction Potential Notes <br /> The first sample point on the graphs represents baseline conditions before remedial <br /> n <br /> 500 ..m activities affected groundwater in the vicinity of the well <br /> 11 _ <br /> ® 40000000000�;.�; Non-detect values are plotted as half of the reporting limit <br /> 10 = y Metals samples were filtered before analysis; concentrations are on a dissolved basis <br /> 300 <br /> r oBlue shading represents periods of treatment through vertical injection borings <br /> c9 200 :I <br /> _ Red shading represents periods of treatment through the horizontal wells <br /> - -_ <br /> pg/L micrograms per liter <br /> 100 = ml r I er <br /> Ar <br /> L r......s.:. .:i ...,.e..:e —— <br /> 8 <br /> oM pS/cm = microSiemens per centimeter <br /> p - <br /> m <br /> r mg/L= milligrams per liter <br /> N 7 -100 WQO=water quality objective (not established if not shown on individual graphs) <br /> v <br /> s —200 © 1 a <br /> -300 <br /> ........ FORMER MARLEY COOLING TOWER COMPANY <br /> 5 n <br /> -400 STOCKTON,CALIFORNIA <br /> nCHEMICAL CONCENTRATIONS OVER TIME IN <br /> 4 _e..... 500 <br /> Jan. 2008 Jan. 2009 Jan. 2010 Jan. 2011 Jan. 2012 Jan. 2013 Jan. 2008 Jan. 2009 Jan. 2010 Jan. 2011 Jan. 2012 Jan. 2013 SHALLOW WELL TW-17 <br /> GRAPH 57 <br />