My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WAGNER
>
200
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0541087
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/22/2019 7:59:21 PM
Creation date
2/22/2019 3:43:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
RECORD_ID
PR0541087
PE
2959
FACILITY_ID
FA0023524
FACILITY_NAME
SPX MARLEY COOLING FACILITY
STREET_NUMBER
200
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
WAGNER
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95215
APN
14331007
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
200 N WAGNER AVE
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
TMorelli
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
434
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2012 Annual Groundwater Monitoring and Evaluation Report <br /> Full-Scale In Situ Hexavalent Chromium Reduction Treatment Implementation <br /> Former Marley Cooling Tower Site, Stockton,California February 2013 <br /> DO measurements indicate the extent to which an environment is either aerobic or anaerobic, <br /> and hence is associated with ORP readings. Biological reduction of Cr+6 and SO4 occurs under <br /> anaerobic conditions; therefore, the extent of the treatment zone would be expected to have <br /> relatively low (i.e., less than 0.5 mg/L) DO concentrations. Phase I baseline DO concentrations <br /> at the Site ranged from 4.60 to 10.3 mg/L. It should be noted that field measurement of DO is <br /> subject to variability due to the inevitable introduction of oxygen to the groundwater while it is <br /> pumped to the surface, and historical sampling practices (using submersible pumps) may create a <br /> high bias in DO readings. Experience at this and other sites shows that DO is generally less <br /> reliable as an indicator parameter than is ORP. However, DO data collected during performance <br /> monitoring are of value in the qualitative comparison of DO concentrations since the baseline <br /> sampling event in 2008. Generally the lower DO values are associated with lower ORP and <br /> indicative of reductive conditions (MW-104 and TW-17). No additional action is recommended <br /> at this time regarding the DO readings. <br /> (a MWH <br /> 4-12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.