My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS (2)
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WAGNER
>
200
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0541087
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/22/2019 6:51:23 PM
Creation date
2/22/2019 3:50:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
RECORD_ID
PR0541087
PE
2959
FACILITY_ID
FA0023524
FACILITY_NAME
SPX MARLEY COOLING FACILITY
STREET_NUMBER
200
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
WAGNER
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95215
APN
14331007
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
200 N WAGNER AVE
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
TMorelli
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
370
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2013 Semiannual Groundwater Monitoring and Evaluation Report <br /> Full-Scale In Situ Hexavalent Chromium Reduction Treatment Implementation <br /> Former Marley Cooling Tower Site,Stockton,California August 2013 <br /> the ultimate precipitation as elemental sulfur. During Phase II, no significant long-term increase <br /> in the SO4 concentration was noted. SO4 concentrations in groundwater were monitored before <br /> and after injection. Analytical data for SO4 sampled during the injection program are <br /> summarized in Table 5 and presented on Graphs 1 through 57. <br /> 4.2.5.1 Background and Compliance Wells. SO4 samples were not collected from <br /> background and compliance wells in the first or second quarters of 2013 in accordance with <br /> MRP No. R5-2012-0814. <br /> 4.2.5.2 Injection Area Wells. During the first and second quarters of 2013, SO4 <br /> concentrations in injection area wells ranged from 9.1 mg/L (MW-105) to 1,610 mg/L (TW-17). <br /> SO4 was detected at concentrations above the WQO at MW-6, MW-104 (S-2), TW-12, and TW- <br /> 17 during the first and second quarters of 2013. <br /> Based on data from Phases I and II, and experience from other sites, SO4 concentrations typically <br /> naturally attenuate as a result of microbiological reduction of SO4 and precipitation of elemental <br /> sulfur. The carbon source (ethanol), supplied in the reductant solution, tends to promote the <br /> growth of SRB and the subsequent reduction of 5O4. Attenuation of SO4 has been noted at <br /> similar sites when a carbon source is added to aid in the growth of SRB. No additional action is <br /> recommended at this time regarding elevated 5O4. <br /> 4.2.6 General Chemistry <br /> Several general chemical parameters were included in the laboratory analytical suite, and the <br /> results are summarized in Tables 4 and 5 and shown on Graphs 1 through 57. Table 6 presents <br /> the proposed upper background concentration limits for background wells in comparison to <br /> historical results and WQOs. The general parameters relevant to the in situ performance <br /> monitoring are: <br /> • TOC, which is introduced as a component of the reductant solution (a carbon source for <br /> the SRB). The presence of TOC in groundwater indicates the potential for SO4 and <br /> associated Cr+6 reduction by SRB. <br /> • TDS, which may increase relative to baseline concentrations following the injection of <br /> the reductant solution(a strongly buffered mixture of calcium bicarbonate and sulfide). <br /> © MWH 4-9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.