SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE

Home Browse Search

Less than Potentially Significant Less-than- Significant w/Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact lm act e. Create or contribute runoff water that would exceed the ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage Systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f. Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? ❑ ❑ ❑ g. Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area, ❑ ❑ ❑ as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard Delineation map? h. Place structures within a 100-year flood hazard area ❑ ❑ ❑ that would impede or redirect floodflows? i. Expose people or structures to a significant risk of ❑ ❑ [❑ loss, injury, or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j. Contribute to inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? ❑ ❑ ❑ I Supporting Documentation/References Cited: 9. LAND USE AND PLANNING - Would the project: a. Physically divide an established community? ❑ ❑ ❑ b. Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or ❑ ❑ ❑ regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c. Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or ❑ ❑ ❑ natural community conservation plan? d. Result in land use/operational conflicts between existing ❑ ❑ ❑ and proposed on-site or off-site land uses? i Supporting Documentation/References Cited: I 10. MINERAL RESOURCES - Would the project: a. Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource ❑ ❑ ❑ that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? b. Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan? 10