Laserfiche WebLink
1.02. The Property is being remediated pursuant to an Oversight and Consultation <br /> Agreement pursuant to Chapter 6.8 of Division 20 of the Health and Safety Code, under <br /> the oversight of the Department. A Revised F reliminary Endangerment Assessment <br /> Report, approved by the Department on March 13, 2000, requires that a deed restriction <br /> be recorded as part of the site remediation, be ause lead, benzo (a) pyrene, benzene, <br /> toluene, ethylbenzene, xylenes, methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE), which are hazardous <br /> substances, as defined in H&SC section 25316, and a hazardous material as defined in <br /> H&SC section 25260, were detected in groundw ter, soil, and sediment samples, below <br /> the surface of the Property. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, Public <br /> Resources Code section 21000 et seq., thI Department has reviewed a Draft <br /> Supplemental Environmental Impact Report/En7ironmental Assessment (Draft EIR/EA) <br /> dated January 12, 2000. The Department commented on the Draft EIRIEA in a letter <br /> dated February 23, 2000. Both the Draft EIR/E-,lh,. and the Department's comment letter <br /> identified the need for a deed restriction for the Weber Block Project. <br /> 1.03. As detailed in the Revised Preliminary Endangerment Assessment approved <br /> by the Department on March 13, 2000, all or a po [on of the subsurface soil, and sediment <br /> within the.Stockton Channel of the Property cont in hazardous substances, as defined in <br /> H&SC section 25316, which include the following contaminants of concern at the following <br /> maximum concentration: benzo (a) pyrene (1.2 milligram/kilogram (mg/kg)), lead (206 <br /> mg/kg), and arsenic (22.1 mg/kg). Groundwater in ear the former Shell site on the Property <br /> ranged from 16 to 19 feet below ground surface uring the monitoring events conducted <br /> in July 1998, October 9998, January 1999, and April 1999. Maximum contaminant <br /> concentrations in groundwater monitoring of eleven wells include: benzene (2.6 <br /> milligrams/liter (mg/1)), toluene (8.3 mg/1), ethylbenzene (2.2 mg/1), xylenes (9.5 mg/1), <br /> methyl tertiary-butyl ether (MTBE) (1.75 mgll), anc total petroleum hydrocarbons (47 mg/1). <br /> Maximum contaminant concentration in an unfiltered groundwater sample collected from <br /> the south side of the Stockton Channel contained lead at 75.3 ug/1. In a Report dated <br /> October 6, 2000, by Baseline Environmental Consulting, the groundwater in the area from <br /> the south side of the Stockton Channel was re-sampled. This sample was filtered prior to <br /> analysis. The analysis of this groundwater sample for total lead was reported at a <br /> concentration of less than 3.0 ug/l, the laboratory reporting limit. <br /> Based on the Final Risk Assessment the calcula ed excess lifetime cancer risk from soil <br /> ingestion and dermal contact for the Site was 2.3 x 10.5, which exceeds the 1 x 10-6 cancer <br /> risk level. The largest contributor to the risk f om this exposure pathway was from <br /> benzo(a)pyrene. The excess lifetime cancer risk from groundwater ingestion and <br /> showering/bathing with volatile organic compoun s and non-volatile organic compounds, <br /> as calculated using on-site groundwater data, was 1.1 x 10-5. The largest contributor to the <br /> risk from this exposure pathway was benzene. The cumulative excess cancer risk from <br /> soil ingestion and dermal contact, groundwater ingestion and showering/bathing with <br /> shallow Rroundwater underlying the Site, ambien . air, and indoor air was calculated to be <br /> 3.3 x 10- . <br /> 2 <br />