My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CHANNEL
>
730
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544199
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/27/2019 8:33:11 PM
Creation date
2/27/2019 4:14:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0544199
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0014183
FACILITY_NAME
RAYMOND INVESTMENT CORPORATION
STREET_NUMBER
730
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
CHANNEL
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95202
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
730 E CHANNEL ST
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
WNg
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
258
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r?Vell Survey Data for Former MP`-npolitan Transit Facility, 730 East Char-l Street, Stoc... Page 1 of 2 <br /> Vicki McCartney [EH] <br /> To: dkresse@condorearth.Com <br /> Subject: RE: Well Survey Data for Former Metropolitan Transit Facility, 730 East Channel Street, Stockton, <br /> CA <br /> Don, <br /> Disregard the request for the survey report for monitoring well MW-3. I don't need a copy of this information since <br /> the well was destroyed. <br /> I am faxing a copy of the surveyor's report dated December 10, 2004, for wells MW-1, MW-2, and MW-3R <br /> located at 730 East Channel Street, Stockton, California, submitted to San Joaquin County Environmental Health <br /> Department. The report does not include the same digital format as data submitted to GeoTracker. In return, I <br /> would appreciate if you would fax a copy of the surveyor's report that contains the same digital information as <br /> submitted to GeoTracker for monitoring wells MW-1, MW-2 and MW-3R. Thank you. <br /> Vicki McCartney,Senior REHS <br /> San Joaquin County <br /> Environmental Health Department <br /> 304 E.Weber Avenue <br /> Stockton,CA 95202-2708 <br /> Phone: (209)468-3456 <br /> Fax: (209)468-3433 <br /> E-mail: vmccartney@sjcehd.com <br /> -----Original Message----- <br /> From: Don Kresse [ma!Ito:dkresse@condorearth.com] <br /> Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2006 1:45 PM <br /> To: Vicki McCartney [EH] <br /> Cc: Nuel Henderson [EH]; Bill Cook; Suzanna Cotton <br /> Subject: Well Survey Data for Former Metropolitan Transit Facility, 730 East Channel Street, Stockton, CA <br /> Hello Vicky, <br /> I thought I'd touch base with you regarding the above referenced site. In your February 22, 2006 <br /> letter for the site, you indicated that we did not include the survey data for MW-3 in our survey <br /> report while we did upload the data for MW-3 into GeoTracker. In addition, you indicated that we <br /> did not include latitude and longitude data in the survey report for the existing three wells. First, I <br /> wanted to provide some clarification;then, perhaps, you can provide me with clarification <br /> regarding the SJCEHD needs. <br /> Regarding MW-3: during the field survey our crew did in fact get coordinates (northing and <br /> casting) for the spot that was previously MW-3 (the top of the grout column). They could not, of <br /> course, get the "well"elevation since the well was previously destroyed and there was no well <br /> collar to survey. So, when we uploaded the data for MW-3 the elevation was recorded as "0.00". I <br /> believe our licensed land surveyor left the latitude and longitude for MW-3 (northing and casting) <br /> off his stamped report because the well was abandoned. I am wondering, in fact, why our field <br /> crew even collected survey information for the destroyed well. In any case, they did, and because <br /> they did we uploaded the data for it to GeoTracker. With this information in mind please let me <br /> know if you would still like us to send you a revised survey report with the MW-3 coordinates <br /> shown. This can be done if you believe it is necessary. Thank you. <br /> 3/22/2006 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.