Laserfiche WebLink
Well Survey Data for Former M- -opolitan Transit Facility, 730 East Char-el Street, Stoc... Page 1 of 1 <br /> Vicki McCartney [EH] <br /> From: Don Kresse [dkresse@condorearth.com] <br /> Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2005 1:45 PM <br /> To: Vicki McCartney[EH] <br /> Cc: Nuel Henderson [EH]; Bill Cook; Suzanna Cotton <br /> Subject: Well Survey Data for Former Metropolitan Transit Facility, 730 East Channel Street, Stockton, CA <br /> Hello Vicky, <br /> I thought I'd touch base with you regarding the.above referenced site. In your February 22, 2006 letter <br /> for the site,.you indicated that we did not include the survey data for MW-3.in our survey.report while. <br /> we did upload the data for MW-3 into.GeoTracker. In addition,you indicated that we did not include <br /> latitude and longitude data in the survey.report for.the existing three wells. First, I wanted to provide <br /> some clarification; then,perhaps,you can provide me with clarification regarding the SJCEHD needs. <br /> Regarding MW-3:.during the field survey our crew.did in fact get coordinates (northing and easting) for <br /> the spot that was previously MW-3 (the top of the grout column). They could not, of course, get the <br /> "well"elevation since the well was previously destroyed and there was no well collar to.survey..So, <br /> when we uploaded the data for MW-3 the elevation was recorded as "0.00"..I believe our licensed land <br /> surveyorleft the latitude and longitude.for.MW-3 (northing and easting) off his stamped report because <br /> the well was abandoned. I am wondering, in fact,why our field crew even collected survey.information <br /> for the destroyed well. In any,case, they did, and because they did we uploaded the data for it to. <br /> GeoTracker. With this information in mind please let me know if you would still like.us to send you a <br /> revised survey report with the MW-3_coordinates shown. This can be done if you believe it is necessary.. <br /> Thank you. <br /> Regarding the coordinates for the other three existing site wells: here I'm at a loss since the latitude and <br /> Iongitude(northing and easting) for the wells is given in the well surveyor.report. These coordinates <br /> were uploaded to.GeoTracker in the same digital format as shown in the well survey report. It is my. <br /> understanding that this is the correct coordinate format..Please advise me on this so we can respond <br /> appropriately. <br /> Thanks, Don Kresse <br /> i <br /> 3/21/2006 <br />