Laserfiche WebLink
FILE COPY <br /> PUBLIC H?ALTH SERVIAS ,oP���%` <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY 2r <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION . <br /> Karen Furst, M.D., M.P.H., Health Officer :iFo.RN,P <br /> 304 East Weber Avenue, Third Floor • Stockton, CA 95202 <br /> 209/468-3420 <br /> APR 17 2000 <br /> KAREN PETRYNA <br /> C/O EQUIVA LLC <br /> PO BOX 6249 <br /> CARSON CA 90749-6249 <br /> RE: TEXACO STATION SITE CODE: 1055 <br /> 440 W CHARTER WAY <br /> STOCKTON CA <br /> San Joaquin County Public Health Services Environmental Health Division (PHS/EHD) has recently <br /> reviewed the last four quarters of groundwater monitoring reports (QMER's), the second generation tank <br /> pull report and the most recent workplan associated with the site referenced above. Although groundwater <br /> monitoring is continuing,the plume is undefined.Data from monitor wells at this facility fail to characterize <br /> the vertical and lateral extent of groundwater contaminant distribution. Concentrations of fuel hydrocarbons <br /> (TPHg,Benzene and MTBE) in down gradient monitor wells MW-9, 10, 11 and 15 are significantly above <br /> primary and secondary water quality standards(MCL's&Taste and Odor Thresholds). <br /> On May 26, 1999 PHS/EHD issued a written directive including the following site-specific requirements. <br /> "Boreholes shall be completed as monitoring wells with appropriate screen intervals to locate and <br /> effectively define the plume (soil and groundwater). At least two boreholes should be continuously cored. <br /> Each continuous core borehole should be located near known contaminant source areas (i.e.,former tank <br /> cavity). All wells installed and surveyed shall be referenced to an appropriate and designated benchmark. <br /> Well screen intervals shall not exceed 20'in total length and should not create a potential vertical conduit. <br /> Report the results ofyour investigation to this agency within 30 days of completion of the approved scope <br /> of work. <br /> You are requested to properly characterize the hydrogeology and groundwater flow conditions in the <br /> vicinity of your site. We also request that you evaluate local groundwater flow conditions and establish a <br /> site-specific localized flownet that is dependent on geologic conditions and is reflected on geologic cross <br /> sections and fence diagrams. Additionally you are required to prepare a rose diagram displaying <br /> groundwater gradient intensity and flow direction. The rose diagram shall be updated to show all historic <br /> groundwater gradients and flow directions to date and shall be provided for all future monitoring event <br /> reports. All plot plan and cross section drawings shall show the location of former and present UST <br /> appurtenances. <br /> We request that you continue to monitor the groundwater contaminant plumes on a quarterly basis. <br /> Additional wells will be required to define the down gradient extent of the plume if the plume continues to <br /> migrate or the first set of wells fail to define the plume(s). In the event continued plume migration is <br /> identified, or impact to water supply wells is predicted please include recommendations for the installation <br /> of additional wells or remediation alternatives in your Quarterly Reports." <br /> The workplan and QMER's submitted since May 26, 1999 fail to address these directives. The most recent <br /> workplan is proposing only one CPT borehole near SB-3, it is unlikely that one CPT borehole can define <br /> the plume and repeated mobilizations are likely to be less cost effective. PHS/EHD now recommends the <br /> 1 . <br /> A Division of San Joaquin County Health Care Services <br />