Laserfiche WebLink
' Mr Kyle Christie Project 0805-146 01 <br /> December 16, 1994 <br />' Page 2 <br /> 1'0 <br /> monitoring well MW-2 Fecal and total coliform bacteria were not detected in the sample collected <br />' from well MW-3 <br /> In January 1993, RESNA observed drill of seven soil borings and the installation of two <br />' groundwater`� onitoring wells and four✓Vapor extraction wells Results of this assessment were <br /> reported in RESNA's first quarter 1993 status report (RESNA, June 9, 1993, Report 31009-7) <br /> Analytical data indicated that hydrocarbons present in soil below 26 feet and in groundwater were <br />' probably from an off-site source Therefore, ARCO requested that an investigation of soil and <br /> groundwater be performed off site and upgradier� o�f the ARCO station to evaluate whether <br /> hydrocarbons were present upgradient of the site !¢1cac��Cku�co+� <br /> In October 1 93, RESNA observed drilling of two soil bonngs and the installation of two <br />' groundwater monitoring wells (MW-6 and MW-7) Analytical data indicated that residual and <br /> dissolved hydrocarbons are present in wells MW-6 and MW-7 (RESNA, February 15, 1994, Report <br /> 31009-9) <br /> GROUNDWATER MONITORING THIRD QUARTER 1994 <br /> Groundwater Technology, Inc , (GTI) of Concord, California, was contracted by ARCO to conduct <br /> the field work at the site, GTI subsequently forwarded their field notes and the laboratory reports to <br />' EMCON Field work included measuring depths to water and collecting groundwater samples for <br /> subjective and laboratory analyses EMCON used these data to evaluate the direction and gradient of <br /> groundwater flow beneath the site <br />' On September 26 1994, a technician from GTI measured depths to water and collected groundwater <br /> samples from wells MW-1 through MW-7 for subjective and laboratory analyses Floating rodu or <br /> product sheen was no notedsri samples from the wells (see Table 1) <br /> The wellhead elevations of the site monitoring wells were previously surveyed by Tom O Morrow Inc <br /> The surveyed elevations and the depth to groundwater measurements, summarized in Table 1, were <br /> used to evaluate the potentiometric surface beneath the site The direction of groundwater flow on <br /> September 26, 1994, wa rtheast with a hydraulic gradient of�� as shown on Figure 2 The <br /> gradient is consistent with pervious data Groundwater elevations have decreased approximately <br /> 123 feet since the last sampling event (June 1994) <br />' Groundwater samples were analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPHG) using <br /> Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Methods 5030/8015 and benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and <br />' total xylenes (BTEX) using EPA Methods 5030/8020 prescribed by the state of California Samples <br /> were also analyzed for halogenated vo organic compounds (HVOCs) using EPA Methods <br /> 5030/ , and the samples from we MW-2 were analyzed for TOG using Standard <br />' Methods (SM) 5520C and 5520F These samples were analyzed at National Environmental Testing, <br /> SA(/PJM80M8051460 WS-94 PAs 2 <br />