ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0012861 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

aC'1}vlS 1\� The eh- afc,1 reporl�ng h►nits «cre the result of dilutions perfomled by the laboratory in order to gnantitate a Targetanal]y q/ ,,); j t? The elevated reporting limits reported in the Method V 1 were due to presence of analysis of samples Q The reported results for GRO/DRO in samples in these samples. have been confirme d as gasoline/diesel. u The reported results for GRO/DRO in samples peaks present in the gasoline quantitation range, however, the peaks present do not resemble he patternhue to for gao�neh�c ❑ The reported results P Po is for GRO/DRO in samples - is/are due to a discrete peak in the C_-C range{probably ..........�� o The reported results for in samples be considered estimated because the associated continuing calibration standard was outside of acceptance criteriahould The reported resu] s for -e4'hppa n p E — C7 1 C �It—l�`Z(� '- z Q in samples . r Uy be biased low because the associated continuing calibration standard was outside of acceptance criteria. may C] The reported results for in samples be biased high because the associated continuing calibration standard was outside of acceptance criteria. may p The reported results for in samples 1 may be biased low since the analyses 1 for these analytes were performed days beyond the U-S.EFA recommended holding time of da s. Y o The reported results for in samples may be biased low/high as demonstrated by a low/high surrogate recovery due to matrix interference. Q The reported results for in samples be considered estimated due to a high relative percent difference reported between the associated LCS and LCSD-Quid r )k The reported results for "T B IT in samples Iffw_�-- 7-0 be biased ii ue to a may `J g average percent recovery reported in the associated}4944&D analysis. r Q The reported results for L C S in samples may be biased IoW/high due to a low/high average percent recovery reported in the associated MS/MSD analysis. © The reported results for in samples should be considered estimated because the primary and confirmation column results differed by greater than 40%RPD o The reported results for in samples should be considered estimated; the samples were initially analyzed within holding time but required dilution, The dilution was performed out'of holding time.