ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0012861 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

F ❑ The elevated reporting limits were the result of dilutions performed by the laboratory in order to quantitate a target anal31e(s); Q The elevated reporting limits reported in the Method analysis of samples were due to presence of in these samples. O The reported results for GRO/DRO in samples have been confirmed as gasoline/diesel. t7 The reported results for GRO/DRO in samples is/are due to peaks present in the gasoline quantitation range, however, the peaks present do not resemble the chromatographic he pattpatternor gasoline. ❑ The reported results for GRO/DRO in samples is/are due to a discrete peals in the C -C_range(probably L) The reported results for ' i in samples be considered estimated because the associated continuing calibration standard should was outside of acceptance criteria. i ❑ The reported results for in samples be biased low because the associated continuing calibration standard was outside of acceptance criteria. may a The reported results for in samples be biased high because the associated continuing calibration standard was outside of acceptance criteria. may ❑ The reported results for in samples may be biased low since the analyses for these analytes were performed days beyond the U.S.EPA recommended holding time of days. i ❑ The reported results for in samples may be biased low/high as demonstrated by a low/high surrogate recovery due to matrix interference. ❑ The reported results for in samples should be considered estimated due to a high relative percent difference reported between the associated LCS and LCSD. ❑ The reported results for in samples may be biased lowthigh due to a lowlhigh average percent recovery reported in the associated MS/MSD analysis. ❑ The reported results for in samples may t Y be biased low/high due to a low/high average percent recovery reported in the associated MS/MSD analysis. ❑ The reported results for in samples should I be considered estimated because the primary and confirmation column results differed by greater than 40%RPD. ❑ The reported results for in samples t P should be considered estimated; the samples were initially analyzed within holding time but required dilution. The dilution was performed out of holding time.