My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0012861
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CHARTER
>
441
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0544208
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0012861
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/1/2019 6:15:48 PM
Creation date
3/1/2019 4:44:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0012861
RECORD_ID
PR0544208
PE
2957
FACILITY_ID
FA0003628
FACILITY_NAME
ARCO STATION #2168*
STREET_NUMBER
441
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
CHARTER
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
14707607
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
441 W CHARTER WAY
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
WNg
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
248
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Former ARCO Station No,2158 <br /> 441 W.Charter Way <br /> Page 2 of 3 <br /> vertically to the vadose zone for SVE recovery. URS selected the depth in <br /> ' <br /> response to SJC/EHD s previously expressed concern with sparging into the sand <br /> interval between 40 and 45 feet below surface grade (bsg). URS plans to test IAS <br /> feasibility with the .whole system installed. SJC/EHD noted to URS on 20 June <br /> 2005 that the State Water Board Cleanup Fund (CUF) may balk at reimbursing for I <br /> installation and operation of a complete remedial system (21 IAS sparge and SVE f <br /> 3 points) that was not shown to be effective for the site through a pilot test. URS t <br /> stated it is USR's belief that ARCO was willing to assume the risks for installation r <br /> of the complete system would not expect reimbursement from the CUF if it is <br /> ineffective. URS further stated during the 20 June 2005 conversation that this <br /> willingness would be put in writing. If this is so, SJC/EHD can approve installation <br /> of the IAS system. <br /> URS has proposed to construct the nested SVE and IAS wells b setting th <br /> Y g e IAS <br /> well screen from 36 to 38 feet bsg with filter pack sand from 33 to 38.5 feet bsg; a <br /> 2-foot bentonite seal from 31 to 33 feet bsg and cement grout from 27 to'31 feet <br /> bsg. The SVE well would then be installed over the grout. You may install the wells <br /> with this design, but the State of California requires that cement grouts be <br /> undisturbed for a minimum of 12 hours following emplacement, which may be <br /> cumbersome for' installing 21 such wells. You may want to consider using <br /> bentonite grout for the whole interval between 27 and 34 feet bsg. The depth #o <br /> groundwater near MW-1 has'generally been less than 30 feet, although it has F <br /> been as deep as 37 feet, so it seems likely that the lower portion of the seal should <br /> always be hydrated and uncompromised. URS agreed with this construction <br /> during a telephone conversation on 22 June 2005. <br /> SJC/EHD inquired of URS on the intended use or destruction of the existing vapor <br /> extraction wells on the site. URS responded that the existing vapor wells would be <br /> plumbed into the SVE system and utilized in accordance with their ability to extract <br /> contaminants and that sufficient access to all wells on the site would be <br /> maintained for proper well destruction at the conclusion of their usefulness. <br /> - i <br /> SJC/EHD is also concerned with the remedial needs of impacted groundwater in I�I <br /> _ the sand unit directly underlying the silt unit targeted for M. URS plans to monitor <br /> the sand interval for a sufficient response to the SVE/IAS operation. URS assured <br /> • SJC/EHD on 20 June 2005, that if the impactedroundwater in the sand unit nrt does <br /> not exhibit a sufficient response to the SVE/IAS operation that they have room and <br /> the willingness to install a remediation system to address that groundwater. <br /> The proposed locations for the three new monitoring wells appear to be <br /> reasonable. The completion depth of the proposed wells is 30 feet bsg, which will <br /> keep the screen intervals in the silt and sandy silt interval. SJC/EHD expressed <br /> interest for monitoring the sand interval approximately 40 to 45 feet bsg if present .z <br /> in the area. URS agreed by telephone on 21 June 2005 to dual complete the..wells <br /> with separate screen intervals to address both intervals of interest. SJC/EHD <br /> i <br /> i <br /> a: <br /> 4t. <br /> a1' <br /> r <br /> �- I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.