Laserfiche WebLink
1 { <br /> Theeporting lirnits wcre the result of dilutions performed by the laborator <br /> 7 in order to quantitate a target a,,,, lc(') <br /> Q The elevated reporting limits reported in the Method <br /> were due to presence of analyses of samples <br /> ❑ The reported results for GRO/DRO in Samples in these samples. <br /> have been confirmed as gasoline/diesel. <br /> ❑ The reported results for GRO/DRO in samples <br /> w <br /> peaks present in the gasoline quantitation range, however, the peaks present do not res/are the to chromatographic <br /> FC) The reported results for GRO/DRO in samples pattern For gasoline. <br /> is/are due to a discrete peak in the C -C ran e <br /> _. g {probably <br /> The reported results for <br /> in samples <br /> be considered estimated because the associated continuing calibration standard was outside of acceptance criter,iahoield <br /> i <br /> The reported results for 'ef hQ n© e <br /> �3 ZD C W —Ln �/�1Z'ZO in samples I <br /> be biased low because the associated continuing calibration standard was outs � aTmay 1 <br /> outside of acceptance criteria. <br /> ❑ The reported results for <br /> Fin samples <br /> Y <br /> be biased high because the associated continuing calibration standard was outside of acceptance criteria. may i <br /> Cl The reported results for <br /> k in samples <br /> may be biased low since the analyses <br /> for these analytes were performed days beyond the U.S.EPA recommended holding time of das. <br /> y <br /> 4 The reported results for <br /> in samples <br /> may be biased low/high as demonstrated by a low/high surrogate recovery due to matrix interference. <br /> i <br /> ❑ The reported results for <br /> _ in samples should <br /> �- be considered estimated due to a high relative percent difference reported between the associated LCS and LCSD. <br /> ❑ The reported results for <br /> in samples <br /> be biased low/high due to a low/high average percent recovery reported in the associated MS/MSD analysis, may <br /> ❑ The reported results for <br /> in samples may <br /> be biased low/high due to a low/high average percent recovery reported in the associated MSIMSD analysis. <br /> ❑ The reported results for <br /> in samples <br /> F be considered estimated because the prima and confirmation should <br /> primary rmateon column results differed by greater than 40%RPD. <br /> © The reported results for <br /> in samples should be t <br /> considered estimated; the samples were initially analyzed within holding time but required dilution. The dilution vas <br /> F <br /> performed out of holding time. <br />