Laserfiche WebLink
URS <br /> Ms. Lori Duncan, REHS Page 3 of 6 <br /> San Joaquin Environmental Health Department <br /> November 15, 2006 <br /> F1Well Destruction <br /> The property owner of the site, Mr. Bill Halverson,has constructed a car wash on the site.ARCO <br /> Fill <br /> coordinated the well destruction activities to occur during property development. ARCO also took <br /> advantage of these site activities to coordinate the installation of a remediation system. ARCO was <br /> asked by the owner to abandon monitoring well MW-4 to make way for the new car wash. <br /> On September 27, 28, 29 and October 3, 2005 vapor wells VW-2,VW-3, VW-4,VW-5,VW-9, VW-12, <br /> and VW-13 as well as monitoring well MW-4 were abandoned by Woodward Drilling a licensed drilling <br /> i contractor by overdrilling. Due to the presence of utilities,VW-6 was destroyed on September 28, 2005 <br /> Fby pressure grouting. <br /> Drilling and Monitoring Well Installation <br /> Four groundwater monitoring wells (MW-9 through MW-12) were installed to further define the lateral <br /> extent of petroleum hydrocarbon-impacted groundwater beneath the site. Seventeen dual completion <br /> SVEIAS wells (EW-1/SP-1 through EW-17/SP-17) and five AS wells (SP-18 through SP-22) were <br /> installed to complete the treatment system well network at the site. <br /> F <br /> From November 3, 2005 through November 15, 2005, Woodward Drilling, of Rio Vista, California, <br /> f drilled and completed a total of twenty-six wells at the site. Prior to drilling, utility clearance was <br /> obtained from Underground Service AIert (USA). Cruz Brothers Locators, a private utility location <br /> contractor, cleared proposed boring locations to ensure that private utilities would not be damaged <br /> during drilling. Boring locations were cleared to a depth of 5 feet below ground surface(bgs)with an air <br /> k knife device prior to drilling. Boring/well locations are shown on Figure 2. <br />!� The borings were drilled using a drill rig equipped with 8- and 10-inch-outside-diameter (OD) hollow- <br /> l stem augers (HSAs) to accommodate the installation of 2-inch diameter groundwater monitoring and <br /> dual completion remediation wells.First groundwater was encountered from approximately 23 to 35 feet <br /> bgs in the borings. <br /> Soil samples were collected at - - <br /> p 5 foot intervals using a modified California split spoon sampler from 5 <br /> feet bgs to the total depth. Soils were logged by a URS geologist according to the Unified Soil <br /> Classification System. Hydrocarbon staining and/or odor were noted in samples collected in all of the <br /> ` wells installed. Soil samples were submitted for laboratory analysis from each soil boring. Soil boring <br /> samples were field preserved using EPA Method 5035 sample kits supplied by the laboratory. Soil <br /> samples collected from approximately 20 feet bgs were submitted for analysis from each boring. <br /> Preservation sample vials for SP-20 were broken following receipt by the laboratory and therefore no <br /> analytical data is included for this boring. Samples were then labeled and placed on ice in a cooler, <br /> pending delivery to Sequoia Analytical Laboratories in Petaluma, California. Soil samples were <br /> analyzed for gasoline range organics (GRO),benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and total xylenes (BTEX), <br /> and for fuel oxygenates/additives (including MtBE)by U.S. EPA Method 8260B. <br /> F <br /> K:\Wprocess;W BP ARC010216K200G System 6istallation\Report.doe <br /> F' <br />