|
CPT Irtterpretattons
<br /> Table 2 References
<br /> iNo Reference
<br /> 1 Robertson,P K and Cwnpanella,R G,1986,"Guidelines for use,Interpretation and Application of the
<br /> CPT and CPN UBC,sal Mechanics Saves No 105,Civil Eng Dept,Vancouver,B C.
<br /> Canada
<br /> 2 Robertson,P K,Campanella,R G,Gillespie,D and Greg,J,1986,"use of Pearreter Cone Data",
<br /> Proceedings of InSitu 86,ASCE Specdlyr Conference,Blacksburg,Virginia
<br /> 3 Robertson,P K and Campanella,R_G,1989,'Guidelines for Geotechnical Design Using CPT and
<br /> CPTU',UBC,Sal Mechanics Sens No 120,Civil Eng Dept.,Vancouver,B C,Canada
<br /> 4 Robertson,P K,1990,'Sal Classffirabon Using the Cone Penetration Test,Canadian Geotechnical
<br /> Journal,Vdume 27
<br /> 5 Robertson,P K and Fear C E,1995,-Liquefaction of Sands and its Evaluation",Keynote Lecture,First
<br /> International Conference on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering,Tokyo,Japan
<br /> 6 T Gregg In Situ Internal Report
<br /> 7 Robertson,P K and Wrde,C E.1997 'Cyclic Liquefaction and ft Evaluation Based an SPT and CPT,
<br /> NCEER Workshop Paper,January 22,1997
<br /> 8 Wnds,C E and Robertson,P K.,1997,`Phase 11 Data Review Report(Massey and Kidd Sties,Fraser
<br /> River Dena)-, Volume 1-Data June 199 Unryasity of Alberta-
<br /> 9
<br /> lberta9 Plewes,H D,Davies,M P and Jeffenes,FAG,1992, 'CPT Based Screwing Procedure for Evaluating
<br /> Liquefaction Susceptibility' 45th Canadian Geotechnical C inference,Toronto,Ontano,
<br /> October 1992
<br /> EGG
<br /> Ir■■r■�■M1
<br />
|