Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Donald Rodgers - 2 - 1 April 2008 <br /> 515 West Charter Way, Stocer, San Joaquin County <br /> VW-2S, and VW-3S, to determine whether off-gassing of volatile components of petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons is occurring from the aquifer to the vadose zone, and whether soil vapor extraction <br /> will be needed during the proposed groundwater remediation. <br /> The assessment phase of the biosparging pilot test will include collecting baseline data prior to air <br /> injection, and then test data to determine changes in oxygen and carbon dioxide gas levels in the <br /> headspace of select observation wells during and after the air injection phase. A portable air <br /> compressor will be used to conduct the pressure step tests. An initial air pressure of 10 pounds <br /> per square inch (psi), which is near the expected hydrostatic pressure for the sparge well screen <br /> interval, will be increased to 15 psi and then to 20 psi for each 2-hour maximum pressure test. If, <br /> during pressure testing, the pressure gauge shows an increase over the baseline reading and <br /> stabilizes after reading the pressure gauge three times in a row in the nearest (10 feet away) <br /> observation well, that pressure test will be ended (minimum <br /> 45 minutes of testing per the above listed sampling frequency). The DO levels in water will <br /> continue to be monitored post pressure testing in two select wells at the following rates: every <br /> 15 minute for the first hour, every 30 minutes for the next three hours, once hourly for the next four <br /> hours, and once per day for the next 4 days. The Workplan concludes that the results of the <br /> biosparging pilot study will be incorporated into the design of the Final Remediation Plan (FRP) for <br /> full-scale remediation. The FRP will include an implementation schedule for construction of the <br /> treatment system, the plans and specifications for the system construction, startup protocols, <br /> routine operations and maintenance manual, performance monitoring criteria and evaluation <br /> reporting, and eventual systems decommissioning. The Workplan states the FRP will be prepared <br /> in accordance with Appendix A-Reports, Tri-Regional Board Staff Recommendations for <br /> Preliminary Investigation and Evaluation of Underground Tank Sites, 16 April 2004. <br /> Report Comment: <br /> Please work with the drapery shop on your property to ensure that upgradient well MW-2R is <br /> accessible for sampling during future quarterly groundwater monitoring events. <br /> Workplan Comments: <br /> At this time I cannot approve the Workplan. The following comments will require a written <br /> response from your consultant. Upon review of the responses and with the stipulation that the <br /> responses adequately address our concerns, I will provide approval to the Workplan. <br /> 1) The Workplan provides two differing sparge well diameters (1 inch in Section 4 and <br /> Figure 6, 2 inch in Section 5) to be constructed in a 3 '/z inch diameter boring. <br /> A) Please advise which casing diameter is correct in your response to comments. <br /> B) Also note that California Department of Water Resources Water Well Standards, <br /> which the San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department (SJCEHD) has <br /> adopted as the SJCEHD well regulations for permitting purposes, do not allow <br /> installation of a well casing with less than 2 inches of annular spacing measured <br /> around all sides of the well casing. In other words, a 1-inch outside diameter well <br /> casing requires a minimum 5-inch boring diameter (a 2 inch well casing requires a <br /> minimum 6 inch boring, etc.). In recent communication with the SJCEHD, I was <br /> informed that there are no know instances of SJCEHD variances given for this well <br />