Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Lori Duncan & Mr. Nuelfnderson December 14, 2006 <br />Page 2 <br />Shaw anticipates that an active groundwater remediation effort will be needed at the property. Some <br />methods for remediation of gasoline hydrocarbons in groundwater may result in increased volatile flux to the <br />subsurface - for example, air sparging - and hence there is a potential that groundwater remediation might <br />temporarily increase risk to site occupants. <br />Shaw recommends an evaluation of the current risk and potential risk during remediation, to human health via <br />inhalation, before determining the removal of the SVE equipment from the property. <br />Recommendations for Site Work <br />Shaw recommends that five tasks be performed at the site: <br />■ Modify Groundwater Sampling Frequency <br />■ Modify Groundwater Monitoring Network <br />■ Evaluate In -Situ Remediation of the Silty Shallow Saturated Zone (-20-40 feet bgs) <br />■ Evaluate In -Situ Remediation of the Sandy Intermediate Saturated Zone (--20-40 feet bgs) <br />■ Evaluate Current Human Health Risk <br />Details on each of these tasks are provided below. <br />Modify Groundwater Sampling Frequency <br />Reduce the frequency of testing water samples from wells MW -2R and MW -3R from quarterly to once <br />annually. Samples from these wells have been consistently free of analytes since November 2003, and the <br />well locations are such that little potential exists for site -related fuel contaminants to migrate towards them. <br />Modify Groundwater Monitoring Network <br />The existing monitoring network does not adequately evaluate the two lithologically-different submerged <br />zones of hydrocarbon that were identified by Shaw in the August 2006 report and in your letter of October 13, <br />2006. Because of the lithologic distinctness of the two zones, it is likely that they will be remediated in <br />different manners and it may be appropriate to distinctly monitor each of them to verify remediation progress <br />and success. <br />Shaw recommends that each of the two zones should have a monitoring network that includes the following: <br />■ At least three wells that are not in a line, so that groundwater flow direction may be evaluated. <br />■ At least one well that monitors impacted hydrocarbons in that zone, so that the fuel analyte content of <br />water in that zone may be monitored for improvement during the course of remediation. <br />Shaw also recommends a resurvey of the tops -of -casing of all the site groundwater monitoring wells, following <br />the construction of new wells. This recommendation is made for the following reasons: <br />KA120221 Don Rodgers\Ltrs\Recommendations.doc Shaw Environmental, Inc. <br />