Laserfiche WebLink
12 December 2014 <br />AGE Project No. 12-2169 <br />Page 3 of 7 <br />should adequately provide data that can be evaluated to determine if technology is <br />suitable to remediate or reduce high dissolved and suspected, deep adsorbed <br />hydrocarbon concentrations at the site. AGE has used this approach at several other <br />sites in San Joaquin County and has had success evaluating the technology using this <br />quantity of media. Furthermore, the overall limited area of hydrocarbon impact at the <br />site, warrants a smaller dose of injection over the proposed six week period. <br />CVRWQCB Comment 3: Performance monitoring should include non -injection wells <br />(MW -6, MW -7S, MW -81, VM -1 and VM -2) to fully evaluate the efficacy of the remedial <br />approach. These non -injection wells should analyzed for the chemical analyses <br />presented in section 4.1. of the Work Plan. <br />To evaluate performance of the pilot ISCO injections, as well as adverse conditions, <br />monitoring event will be performed once following the second proposed injection event <br />and two months following the final injection event. Monitoring and sampling will be <br />conducted using wells B3RNW-1 D, B4R/VW-2D, B5R/VW-3D, MW -4R -D, MW -7S, <br />MW -81, MW -91 and MW -101 (Figures 1 and 2). All wells will be monitored and sampled <br />as described in Comment 1. <br />CVRWQCB Comment 4: A review of the proposed injection wells and Site drawings <br />indicate that the quantity and distribution of the proposed injection wells leaves an <br />inadequate monitoring well network for the Site. Wells used for injection are not suitable <br />for use as monitoring points as the water chemistry will have been altered as a result of <br />the injection of the hydrogen peroxide solution Central Valley Water Board staff request <br />that AGE evaluate the proposed injection wells and either reduce the number of <br />injection wells to allow sufficient monitoring or recommend the installation of additional <br />wells to adequately monitor the results of the injection. <br />Based on Regional Board comments, AGE recommends installing two dedicated <br />shallow injection and two intermediate injection wells is areas as described below: <br />• One shallow injection well will be installed north of the eastern most UST area <br />and north of historically impacted well MW -4R -D; <br />• One shallow injection well will be installed at the southern end of the eastern- <br />most UST area and north of historically impacted well MW -7S; <br />• One intermediate injection well will be installed southwest of historically impacted <br />well MW -91 and in the apparent core area of the intermediate dissolved plume; <br />and <br />• One intermediate injection well will be installed north of historically impacted well <br />MW -81 and in the apparent core area of the intermediate dissolved plume. <br />Advanced GeoEnvironmental, Inc. <br />