My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WORK PLANS
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CHARTER
>
515
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0527799
>
WORK PLANS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/4/2019 2:43:14 PM
Creation date
3/4/2019 1:26:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
WORK PLANS
RECORD_ID
PR0527799
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0018844
FACILITY_NAME
TRANSMISSION STORE
STREET_NUMBER
515
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
CHARTER
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
14707408
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
515 W CHARTER WAY
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
WNg
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
124
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Within the last five years, the depth to water has varied between 19 to 27 feet bgs in site wells <br />(IT Corporation, 2002; and Shaw, 2006a, 2007). Fluctuation in water levels may be attributed to <br />' not only seasonal rainfall, but also the operation of the Port of Stockton and the pumping of <br />groundwater supply wells in the Stockton vicinity. Groundwater elevations in the deeper wells <br />were slightly lower than in the shallow wells (e.g., the well pair, MW-4RS and MW-4RD). This <br />is an expected result of groundwater flow away from the Port of Stockton. <br />The Port of Stockton is located to the north and west of the site and local groundwater is inferred <br />to flow eastward from the port. Quarterly groundwater monitoring events have noted <br />' groundwater flow direction varying from northwest to northeast to east at an average gradient of <br />0.002 feet per feet. Slug tests were performed on wells MW-4RS and MW-4RD in May 2006. <br />The resultant hydraulic conductivity for MW-4RS, screened from 35 to 50 feet bgs, was <br />calculated to be 57 feet/day. The hydraulic conductivity at MW-4RD, screened from 75 to 80 <br />feet bgs, was calculated to be 194 feet/day (Shaw, 2006b). <br />2.3 Investigation History Summary <br />An environmental investigation of the site was initiated following the removal of the 550 -gallon <br />UST in 1996. Soil samples collected from beneath the excavation indicated the presence of <br />residual hydrocarbons. Subsequent site assessment revealed the presence of residual <br />hydrocarbons in both the vadose zone and groundwater. <br />SVE was conducted at the site from February 2000 until October 2004 to address the petroleum <br />hydrocarbon contamination in the soil within the vadose zone. Over the treatment period, <br />approximately 3,244 pounds of total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPH-g) and 4.9 <br />pounds of benzene were removed from the soil (CVRWQCB, 2007). <br />In March 2006, Shaw performed a site characterization, including sampling soil and groundwater <br />using direct -push and field screening techniques to assess the lateral and vertical distributions of <br />residual hydrocarbons. Results indicated the presence of elevated petroleum hydrocarbon <br />concentrations between 35 feet and 60 feet bgs and near the former UST location in the eastern - <br />southeastern area of the site (Shaw 2006a). <br />Quarterly groundwater monitoring has resumed at the site since September 2007. At the request <br />of CVRWQCB and the San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department, further <br />investigation of the vertical extent of the hydrocarbon contamination in the saturated zone is <br />' being conducted at the site. Results will be used to determine if groundwater treatment below 60 <br />feet bgs is required. <br />BiospargePilot Test Final doc 2-3 Shaw Environmental, Inc. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.