Laserfiche WebLink
TABLE 1 -CHECKLIST OF REQUIRED DATA <br /> FOR NO FURTHER ACTION REQUESTS AT UNDERGROUND TANK SITES <br /> Site Name and Location-7[Shell-Branded Service Station, 620 W. Charter Way, Stockton, San Joaquin County(RB#390396) <br /> :Y::] 1. Distance to production wells for municipal,domestic, A 2004 sensitive receptor survey reported no water supply <br /> agriculture, industry and other uses within 2000 feet of wells within 2,000'of the Site. <br /> the site. <br /> Y 2.Site maps,to scale,of area impacted showing In 6/87, one 550-gallon waste oil UST was removed. In <br /> locations of any former and existing tank systems, 11/89,one 8,000-gallon, two 10,000-gallon gasoline and one <br /> excavation contours and sample locations,boring and 550-gallon waste oil USTs were removed. Site maps and <br /> monitoring well elevation contours,gradients,and figures showing tank locations, excavations,building and <br /> nearby surface waters,buildings,streets,and residual pollutants were provided in investigation reports. <br /> subsurface utilities; <br /> Y 3.Figures depicting lithology(cross Site lithology consists of clay,silt,and sand to 100, the total depth investigated <br /> section), treatment system diagrams; Active remediation included free product skimmer(1990),and soil vapor <br /> extraction 1992-1996.All figures were provided in the remediation reports. <br /> Y 1 4.Stockpiled soil remaining on-site Approximately 1,058 cubic yards of soil was excavated and transported to an <br /> or off-site disposal(quantity); unknown location. Mass estimate for excavated soil was not reported by the <br /> consultant. <br /> S.Monitoring wells remaining on-site, Twenty(20)monitoring wells(MW-1 through MW-11,MW-13-50,MW-13-77, MW- <br /> ate; 14-50,MW-14-77,MW-15-77,MW-16-50, MW-16-77,MW-16-90 and MW-17-50)will <br /> be properly destroyed prior to closure. <br /> 6. Tabulated results of all groundwater Tabulated data was provided in reports indicating depth to groundwater from <br /> elevations and depths to water; 14'bgs to 39'bgs. Groundwater flow direction was from east to northwest. <br /> Groundwater gradient varied from 0.002 ft/ft to 0.006 ft/ft. <br /> LYJ 7. Tabulated results of all sampling All data was adequately tabulated in various reports, including waste oil analyses. <br /> and analyses: <br /> Y❑ Detection limits for <br /> confirmation sampling <br /> Lead analyses <br /> 8. Concentration contours of contaminants found and those remaining in The horizontal and vertical extent of the <br /> soil and groundwater,and both on-site and off-site: petroleum pollution extends from the site <br /> to approximately 80'to the east under the <br /> Y❑Lateral and Y❑Vertical extent of soil contamination neighboring motel at MW-14-77. Shallower <br /> Lateral and Vertical extent of groundwater contamination adjacent MW-14-50 is non-detect. <br /> 9.Zone of influence calculated and assumptions used for subsurface A free product skimmer and a soil vapor <br /> remediation system and the zone of capture attained for the soil and extraction treatment system were installed. <br /> groundwater remediation system; <br /> 10.Reports/information FY Unauthorized Release Form ❑Y QMRs(86) 12-89 to 10-12 <br /> ❑Y Well and boring logs 0 PAR EY FRP ❑Y Other Case Closure Request, 10-13 <br /> Y 11.Best Available Technology(BAT)used or Leak was stopped by removing tanks and piping. Over-excavation,free <br /> an explanation for not using BAT; product skimming,and SVE were chosen as the BAT. <br /> Y 12. Reasons why background was/is-not Soil pollution presents a minimal threat to human health and <br /> finable using BAT; groundwater pollution is predicted to be restored in 33 years. <br /> Y 13.Mass balance calculation of substance Consultant estimated gasoline release of 23,361 lbs. (3,805 gal.). <br /> treated versus that remaining; Skimmer removed 1,188 lbs.(180 gal.)of free product, SVE removed <br /> 17,628 lbs. (2,670 gal.)of TPH in soil.Residual TPH mass is estimated <br /> as 4,285 lbs. 649 al. in soil and 10.3 lbs. 1.37 al. in groundwater. <br /> Y 14. Assumptions, parameters, calculations Site is an active service station and passed the LTCP. Consultant states <br /> 7 <br /> and model used in risk assessments,and fate site does not represent a significant environmental or health risk.Fund <br /> and transport modeling; recommended case for closure. <br /> Y 15. Rationale why conditions remaining at Soil and groundwater pollution is reportedly confined to 80'from the <br /> site will not adversely impact water quality, property limits.Land use(commercial)is not expected to change in the <br /> health,or other beneficial uses;and foreseeable future. WQOs are predicted to be reached by 2047. <br /> Groundwater plume is stable and slowly decreasing in concentration. <br /> By: JLB Comments:Multiple USTs were removed at the subject site.Based on the stable and declining <br /> concentrations in groundwater,no foreseeable changes in future land use(commercial),and minimal risks <br /> Date: from soil vapor and soil,Regional Board staff concur with San Joaquin County's Closure Recommendation. <br /> 2/4/2014 <br />