Laserfiche WebLink
PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICES <br /> pp,O, U IN_ C <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY ?• ` ' .o <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION „; / A <br /> Ernest M. Fujimoto, M. D., M.P.H., Acting Health Officer <br /> 304 E. Weber Ave., Third Floor • P. O. Box 388 • Stockton, CA 95201 -0388Z ' 71FOa`" <br /> � R <br /> 209/468-3420 `f j , f � }�'� <br /> MAILED NOV 2 9199 <br /> ROGER LISTON <br /> 3450 EL CAMINO <br /> CERES CA 95307 <br /> RE: Gasco Service Station SITE CODE: 1060 <br /> 749 East Charter Way <br /> Stockton, CA 95206 <br /> This letter shall summarize the November 14 , 1995 meeting attended by yourself, John Cussen <br /> and Richard Miriam representing California Geophysical Group , and Diane Hinson and myself <br /> representing San Joaquin County Public Health Services , Environmental Health Division <br /> (PHS/EHD) . <br /> At this meeting, John Cussen presented a dual plume theory based upon the relative levels of <br /> contamination detected in monitoring wells and hydropunches located west of the site . The <br /> purpose for his presentation was to establish that there is sufficient evidence to indicate the <br /> presence of a plume from the ARCO site , and the ARCO well if necessary , should installed by <br /> ARCO . <br /> You may present this theory at the Technical Review Committee of the Environmental Health <br /> Division meeting scheduled for December 21 , 1995 at 1 : 30 p . m. In order to properly present <br /> your case you should tabulate all monitoring well and soil analytical data in spreadsheet format, <br /> present soil lithology data in the form of fence diagrams , resurvey all wells to an established <br /> bench mark and tabulate all gradients recalculated with the new survey data, and include a <br /> rationale for not installing the ARCO sidewalk well . You need ten copies of this report, to <br /> provide one for each committee member. Please submit the reports by December 20 , 1995 . <br /> An agenda of the meeting is enclosed. <br /> You are currently in violation of the compliance date established in the PHS/EHD letter of <br /> August 1 , 1995 . In that letter you were directed to install vapor extraction wells in the locations <br /> designated by the currently installed manifold system by August 30, 1995 . Due to the presence <br /> of the manifold system, additional data regarding groundwater plumes , vapor plumes, soil <br /> plumes , or zones of influence, which would affect the vapor well locations , is inconsequential. <br /> Due to the inability of Pep Boys and Darpetro Exxon to reach an access agreement within a <br /> reasonable time , it is the intention of PHS/EHD to reconsider Pep Boys for responsible party <br /> status , for the contamination which exists on their site . <br /> c <br /> I <br /> A Division of San Joaquin County Health Care Services <br />