Laserfiche WebLink
Rodger Liston - <br /> Darpetro Inc. <br /> 749 E. Charter Way, Stockton, California <br />'I Page 3 of 3 <br /> Also, state in the plan the laboratory analytical regime to be followed for the samples, the <br /> containers to be utilized for the samples , how the samples will be transferred into the containers, <br /> and other pertinent details related to the ground water sampling events. <br /> As EHD's previously stated goal of having an approved ground water monitoring and sampling <br /> plan in place prior to the next quarterly monitoring event still holds, the revised plan is still due in <br /> this office by 21 June 2004. Please have all the issues noted in this letter, and any other pertinent <br /> issues properly and adequately addressed . <br /> Amended Quarterly Report October 2003 was submitted in response to an EHD directive issued <br /> in the 13 April 2004 letter. EHD directed the revision due to numerous deviations from the <br /> protocols, including use of a pump and a sampling bailer that were not decontaminated before <br /> use in each well, as was noted in the EHD 13 April 2004 letter. The original report did note use of <br /> a contaminated bailer, but stated that the pump was decontaminated — the latter point in error. <br /> The EHD directive was issued for your consultant to correct this error. However, the amended <br /> report now states that both the pump and the bailer were decontaminated and refers to the <br /> protocols. Referral to the protocols to describe field procedures is acceptable if the protocols are <br /> applicable and are followed closely with all deviations from the protocols noted . In this case, the <br /> protocols were not followed closely, deviations were not noted , and the report falsely states the <br /> equipment was decontaminated . This may have a very significant impact on data quality. It is the <br /> responsibility of the person having responsible professional charge of the work to ensure that all <br /> procedures are followed and that deviations are accurately reported so that the resulting data can <br /> be fairly evaluated by other workers or reviewers. The 08 May 2004 amended report is :not <br /> acceptable to EHD Please have the third quarter 2003 report re-corrected and reissued . The <br /> revised report must be submitted to this office no later than 01 June 2004. Also, please be aware <br /> that the field procedures utilized for the first quarter 2004 monitoring event, which included many <br /> deviations from the protocols as noted by EHD , must be accurately reported . <br /> If there is any confusion on any of these issues , please call the undersigned for clarification . EHD <br /> desires to assist you and/or your consultant in this matter as much as possible. EHD would rather <br /> spend time helping the consultant properly address the issues than spend excessive time <br /> reviewing and commenting on an incomplete and/or inadequate work plan . Questions or <br /> comments may be directed to Nuel Henderson at (209) 468-3436. <br /> Donna Heran, REHS, Director <br /> Environmental Health Division <br /> Nuel C. Henderson, Jr. , RGMarga, RE ` <br /> Unit IV - Site Mitigation Unit IV Supervisor <br /> cc: James Barton - CVRWQCB <br /> John Cussen — California Geophysical Group, Inc. <br /> Mark Owens — SWRCB Cleanup Fund <br />