My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO 1988 - 2000
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WILSON
>
130
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0231861
>
COMPLIANCE INFO 1988 - 2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2024 1:26:35 PM
Creation date
3/5/2019 1:32:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
1988 - 2000
RECORD_ID
PR0231861
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0003601
FACILITY_NAME
ARCO STATION #826951*
STREET_NUMBER
130
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
WILSON
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205-5561
APN
15502064
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
130 S WILSON WAY
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
KBlackwell
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
272
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
02/22/99 113:01 1,10.736 D04 <br /> 9 Repair procedures Cutting repaircouplings <br /> (Cont. on 2-inch coupiings the center doles have been located near the middle of the <br /> coupling.Cut exactly between these two holes.The resuRing half-couplings are <br /> I inches long,Two cuts are necessary when staking 3-and 4-inch ham-couplings, <br /> The resulting half-couplings are 51h inches long. <br /> D � i p <br /> O 0 0 <br /> .` <br /> O 0 "10 a <br /> Fig.9-8.Cut fulf-fertgth coupfings so Cut na mains2 tract+ ; <br /> thatait bolt holesonhaplcoW s ttalt•eouplires Cutmmake3 <br /> are equidistant from the ends. Wd+-Irons <br /> nalt•raup6ngs <br /> 0 <br /> Primary system Recommended practices <br /> testing Pian tests carefully and can them out with all due precautions.Pressurizing <br /> equipment should be suited to the size of the system and the pressure required w d <br /> should be operated by qualtried and experienced personnel only. <br /> r--------------------- ---------� <br /> I The following recommendations are offered only as a guide.Ameron assumes no I <br /> 1 responsibility or I''Lablk for the consequences of any testing practices. 1 <br /> L----------..,...... ----- ---J <br /> • Pressure sources should be capable of approaching test pressure gradually. <br /> • Use gauges with a full-scale reading of no more than twice the test pressure:Do <br /> not use a 100 psi gauge for a 10 psi test.Use reliable gauges calibrated against <br /> a dead weight tester and zeroed for atmospheric pressure. <br /> • Isolate tanks from the piping when pressure testing. <br /> • The recommended hydrostatic pressure is 1509 of expected operating <br /> pressure and should be maintained at least 10 minutes. <br /> • Do not exceed 150%of system rating.Check the pressure rating of ail the <br /> components of ttiesystem -+lot just the pipe—because hoses and flexible <br /> connectors are aimost always rated lower than the pipe. <br /> • Do not adjust fittings while system is under pressure.If threaded adapters or <br /> bushings Wa:<.release the pressure before attempting to toten. <br /> • 7emperature changes can affect the pressure in the test line.Substantial <br /> pressure increases may occur in closed systems exposed to the sun. <br /> Conversely,overnight decreases in pressure due to cooling from afternoon to <br /> early rooming are no mid and do not necessarily indicate a leak, <br /> • After testing.maintain 5 to 10 psi(35 to 70 kPa)in the system during subsequerrt <br /> construction so that damage caused by stakes,excavation equipment,etc.can <br /> be detected and corrected before pavement is installed or product is pumped. <br /> r y <br /> Arneron recommends hydrostatic testing of primary systems as the effects of <br /> sudden pressure less when testing with liquids are far less severe than with gases, I <br /> I If pneumatic testing is necessary,restrain the system adequately to prevent <br /> damage orirjury in case of rapid pressure loss_Pneumatic testing can be <br /> I extremely dangerous and is not recommended. <br /> L----------------------------- <br /> 75 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.