ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0011059 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Cwfo foal T"&%xs lne. Page 2 Groundwater Mon tonng Report Project No 724 2 November 12,2004 1.0 GROUNDWATER MONITORING 1.1 Hydrogeology of Site The site's monitoring wells are screened through various levels of the aquifer as shown in Figure 14 The wells' construction details are indicated in Table 7 ' Horizontal Groundwater Gradients Due to there being monitoring well sets at three different depth intervals (water table, intermediate & deep), three different horizontal gradients were calculated, one for each interval The calculated gradients for the July 2004 monitoring event are as follows Water table wells screened 25 to 50 ft bgs 0 014 ft/ft flowing S62°E Intermediate wells screened 42 to 64 ft bgs 0 0023 ft/ft flowing N60°E Deep wells screened 65 to 80 ft bgs 0 0018 ft/ft flowing S50°E* *MW-104 not utilized for gradient deternnnarion due to deeper well screen(87 5—90') Figures 2, 3 & 4 show the respective gradient directions for the shallow, intermediate and deep wells, respectively The data for well MW-104 are omitted in Figure 4 contours due the well's deeper screened interval, and monitoring wells MW-106 and MW-110 are not used for contouring in Figure 3 due to anomalous data Tables 1, 2 & 3 in Appendix A contain the historical groundwater elevations and gradients for the shallow, intermediate and deep wells respectively ' ' Figures 5A, 5B and 5C, Groundwater Gradient Rose Diagrams, illustrate the historical groundwater directions for the three respective horizons The groundwater direction was ' easterly for all three aquifer intervals for this monitoring event The average elevation of groundwater in the water table wells site was —23 04 feet MSL ' (below mean sea level) or approximately 38 feet below grade surface This elevation represents a decrease of 135 feet since the April 2004 monitoring event The water level has risen significantly at the site since October of 1992 when groundwater was—39 feet MSL The rose diagram included in Figure 5A shows that the water table groundwater gradients at this site are consistently towards the east In Figure 5A, arrows labeled 22 and above were measurements made after November 2000 Since additional wells were installed in November 2000, the groundwater direction has had a more southerly component suggesting that the earlier measurements were biased due to the spatial orientation of fewer wells The ' rose diagram included in Figure 5B shows that the intermediate aquifer gradients at this site have been consistently to the east for the last eleven events The rose diagram included in 1