My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0011122
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CHARTER
>
814
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544222
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0011122
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2019 6:07:03 PM
Creation date
3/5/2019 2:37:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0011122
RECORD_ID
PR0544222
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0005976
FACILITY_NAME
TIRE & WHEEL MASTERS
STREET_NUMBER
814
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
CHARTER
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
16718101
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
814 E CHARTER WAY
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
WNg
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
75
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Morita Brothers 16 May 6, 1992 <br /> The first option, natural in-situ biodegradation (i e , no action), is viable given the 55 <br /> ' feet of vertical separation between the deepest known impacted soil and the first <br /> occurrence of groundwater as well as the significant amount of clay in the <br /> ' intervening sedimentary section However, the concentrations of gasoline <br /> hydrocarbons present a risk of leaching to groundwater, and require that remedial <br /> ' actions be understanding to reduce the concentrations to below the RWQCB <br /> recommended guidelines <br /> ' In option 2 contaminated soil would be excavated until field hydrocarbon screening <br /> indicates that the limits of contamination have been reached Additional sampling <br /> ' from within the excavation would be performed to confirm the results of the field <br /> screening The location of suitable disposal depends on the concentration of <br /> contaminants in the soil after it is stockpiled Judging from the findings of this <br /> study, it appears likely that the soil would qualify to be recycled at the Gibson Oil <br /> Refinery's solids recycling facility in Bakersfield This disposal option would cost in <br />{ approximately of $200 per cubic yard including excavation, transportation, <br />' recycling, and generators fees, or approximately $100,000, and recycling alleviates <br /> the clients future liability for the soil <br />' Option 3 is to treat the soil in place through in-situ vapor extraction The soil <br /> remains in place, and the gasoline hydrocarbons are extracted through wells drilled <br />' into the impacted soil The effectiveness of this option is dependant on the ability of <br /> an air flow to be created throughout the zone of impacted soil, permitting the <br />' gasoline hydrocarbons to volatilize, and then being extracted through the wells The <br /> stratigraphy at this site only partially lends itself to vapor extractiondue to the lower <br /> pernicabilities in the upper sediments and very low permeabilities in the clays below <br /> 27 feet below surface grade However, the primary impacted zone from 13 to 27 feet <br /> does exhibit adequate permeability ESE has experience in vapor extraction of <br /> gasoline hydrocarbons from low permeability soils which indicates that with a well <br /> engineered system, the gasoline hydrocarbons can be successfully removed from <br />' these lower permeability zones However, these zones will require placement of <br /> several additional extraction wells, and the time frame for successful treatment will <br /> E13-8101-2 9204-E044 RPT <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.