Laserfiche WebLink
Geolagual Tec"CS INC Page 6 <br /> 3"Quai ter 2003 Groundwatei Monitoimg Report <br /> Project No 507 2 <br /> November 13,2003 <br /> ' 3 0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> Conclusions <br /> 1 Elevated concentrations of BTEX, TPH-G and MTBE are present in a laterally limited <br /> ' groundwater plume that is centered on MW-9 <br /> 2 The MTBE and previously monitored 1,2-DCA plumes are insignificant in comparison <br /> to the BTEX and TPI-I-G plumes <br /> ' 3 The lateral extent of the contamination plume is defined to the east, northeast and <br /> southeast by wells MW-3, MW-2 and MW-I respectively <br /> 4 The TPH-G plume is defined to the northwest and southwest by wells MW-10 and MW- <br /> ' 7 respectively <br /> 5 The BTEX/TPH-G groundwater contamination plume is defined by MW-109 in the <br /> vertical plane, which is seteened 40 feet below MW-9 This suggests that the vertical <br /> gradient is not moving the contaminants to any degree <br /> 6 The groundwater giadient flows to the northeast or east with relatively flat slopes, which <br /> appears not to significantly influence contaminant migration <br /> ' 7 The site exhibits a predominantly downward component of vertical groundwater flow, <br /> which is approximately the same slope as the horizontal gradient These components of <br /> groundwater flow appear not to cause preferential contaminant migration <br /> 8 The groundwater contaminant concentrations are on the rise, which correlates with a <br /> decrease of groundwatei levels The center of the plume has not migrated beyond the <br /> source area giving evidence that the plume is not migrating laterally or vertically by <br /> advective flow <br /> 9 The data shows that the plume is stable and is not being degraded by natural <br /> ' biodegiadation causes <br /> Recommendations <br /> • Maintain the modified quarterly monitoring schedule <br /> • Monitor the site wells ibr indicators of remediation by natural attenuation <br /> • A work plan foi "Ira Situ Reniediation Feasibility Study" dated September 20, 2002 and <br /> an addendum to the plan were submitted to San Joaquin County Environmental Health <br /> Depaitment (SJC EHD) SJC EHD approved the study in their March 20, 2003 letter <br /> and requested a detailed work plan for evaluation GTI submitted our June 10, 2003 - - <br /> ' "In-Situ Remedtation Pilot Test" work plan for an in-situ remediation pilot project and <br /> SJC EHD issued approval of the work plan in their September 10, 2003 letter The <br />' implementation of the work plan will be scheduled pending cost pre-approval from the <br /> USTCFP <br />