My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO 2004 - 2006
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WILSON
>
130
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0231861
>
COMPLIANCE INFO 2004 - 2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/20/2023 11:39:42 AM
Creation date
3/7/2019 9:33:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
2004 - 2006
RECORD_ID
PR0231861
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0003601
FACILITY_NAME
ARCO STATION #826951*
STREET_NUMBER
130
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
WILSON
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205-5561
APN
15502064
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
130 S WILSON WAY
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
KBlackwell
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
279
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Monitoring System Certification <br />Site Address: '5469: 130 S WILSON WAY, STOCKTON, CA 95205 <br />D. Results of Testuig/Servicing <br />Software Version Installed: . l� <br />Comulete the followine checklist: <br />Date of TestingJServicing: � V z � -�`.� <br />rf Yes <br />No* <br />Is the audible alarm operational? <br />No* <br />Is the visual alarm o erational? <br />reyoe <br />No* <br />Were all sensors visuallins ected, function alltested, and confirmed o esational? <br />No* <br />Were all sensors installed at lowest point of secondary containment and positioned so that other equipment will <br />not interfere with their proper operation? <br />Yes <br />No* <br />If alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring station, is all communications equipment (e.g. modem) <br />Ir <br />NIA <br />operational? <br />Yes <br />No* <br />For pressurized piping systems, does the turbine automatically shut down if the piping secondary containment <br />a NIA <br />monitoring system detects a leak, fails to operate, or is electrically disconnected? If yes: which sensors initiate <br />positive shut -down? (Check all that apply)S_ mp/Trench Sensors;)t§,Zispenser Containment Sensors. <br />Did you corfirmpositive shut -down due to leaks armed. sensor failureldisconnection es; ONO. <br />Yes <br />Y No* <br />For tank systems that utilize the monitoring system as the primary tank overfill warning device (i.e. no <br />NIA <br />mechanical overfill prevention valve is installed), is the ove&JI warning alarm visible and audible at the tank <br />3CG' <br />O <br />fill point(s) and operating properly? If so, at what percent of tank capacity does the alarm trigger? ....9'a <br />s* <br />A No <br />Was any monitoring equipment replaced? If yes, identify specific sensors, probes, or other equipment replaced <br />and list the manufacturer name and mo del for allre lacement arts in Section F, below. <br />[] Yes* <br />• No <br />Was liquid found inside any secondary containment systems designed as dry systems? (Check all fiagrply)n <br />Product; M Water. If res, describe causes in Section E, below. <br />Yes <br />No* <br />Was monitoring system set-up reviewed to ensure proper settings? <br />[] No* <br />Is all monitoring a ui mentoperational per manufacturer's s ecifications? <br />* In Sec6ox E below, descrbe kow and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected. <br />E. Comments: <br />Page 2 of 3 03M 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.